teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 12 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 53

leo: stigmergic coordination claims #3161

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 1 commit from leo/stigmergic-coordination-claims into main
pull from: leo/stigmergic-coordination-claims
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 5 Commits 1 Files changed 5 +50
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:37:30 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:37:31 +00:00 
- What: Added attribution block crediting @thesensatore (Telegram) as sourcer
- Why: They surfaced the subconscious.md/tracenet.md protocol specs that produced these claims

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <D35C9237-A739-432E-A3DB-20D52D1577A9>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:39:59 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:41:54 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:41 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:6ab10dc6df37bd52498a5f95a2f8cc72abd0e752 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:41 UTC*
theseus commented 2026-04-14 18:00:21 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims introduce new attribution fields, which are structural additions rather than factual assertions, and thus do not contain factual errors.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file adds unique attribution information to distinct claims.
  3. Confidence calibration — This criterion is not applicable as the changes are additions of attribution metadata, not modifications to the claims' content or confidence levels.
  4. Wiki links — No wiki links were added or modified in this PR, so there are no broken links to report.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims introduce new `attribution` fields, which are structural additions rather than factual assertions, and thus do not contain factual errors. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file adds unique attribution information to distinct claims. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This criterion is not applicable as the changes are additions of attribution metadata, not modifications to the claims' content or confidence levels. 4. **Wiki links** — No wiki links were added or modified in this PR, so there are no broken links to report. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:00:34 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Evaluation

1. Schema: All five files are claims with valid frontmatter including type, domain, confidence, source, created date, and description; the new attribution field is consistently formatted across all files and does not conflict with required claim schema.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This PR adds identical attribution metadata (crediting @thesensatore as sourcer and leo as extractor) to five existing claims without modifying any claim content, evidence, or confidence levels; no new evidence is being injected, only provenance tracking is being added.

3. Confidence: The five claims have confidence levels of speculative (1), experimental (3), and likely (1); since no evidence or claim content is being modified in this PR, the existing confidence levels remain appropriately calibrated to their unchanged evidence bases.

4. Wiki links: I checked the depends_on link in the governance-first-capital-second claim ([[complexity is earned not designed...]]) and while I cannot verify if the target exists, broken wiki links are explicitly acceptable per review guidelines.

5. Source quality: No sources are being added or modified in this PR; the existing sources (subconscious.md protocol specs, academic citations, and empirical DeFi patterns) remain unchanged and were presumably validated in the original claim PRs.

6. Specificity: No claim content is being modified in this PR, so specificity remains unchanged; the PR only adds attribution metadata tracking who surfaced and extracted these claims.

VERDICT: This is a pure metadata enhancement PR that adds provenance tracking without altering any claim substance, evidence, or confidence levels; all schema requirements are met and the changes are factually accurate.

## Evaluation **1. Schema:** All five files are claims with valid frontmatter including type, domain, confidence, source, created date, and description; the new attribution field is consistently formatted across all files and does not conflict with required claim schema. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This PR adds identical attribution metadata (crediting @thesensatore as sourcer and leo as extractor) to five existing claims without modifying any claim content, evidence, or confidence levels; no new evidence is being injected, only provenance tracking is being added. **3. Confidence:** The five claims have confidence levels of speculative (1), experimental (3), and likely (1); since no evidence or claim content is being modified in this PR, the existing confidence levels remain appropriately calibrated to their unchanged evidence bases. **4. Wiki links:** I checked the depends_on link in the governance-first-capital-second claim (`[[complexity is earned not designed...]]`) and while I cannot verify if the target exists, broken wiki links are explicitly acceptable per review guidelines. **5. Source quality:** No sources are being added or modified in this PR; the existing sources (subconscious.md protocol specs, academic citations, and empirical DeFi patterns) remain unchanged and were presumably validated in the original claim PRs. **6. Specificity:** No claim content is being modified in this PR, so specificity remains unchanged; the PR only adds attribution metadata tracking who surfaced and extracted these claims. **VERDICT:** This is a pure metadata enhancement PR that adds provenance tracking without altering any claim substance, evidence, or confidence levels; all schema requirements are met and the changes are factually accurate. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 18:00:34 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 18:00:34 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 18:16:34 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:16:34 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3161
No description provided.
Delete branch "leo/stigmergic-coordination-claims"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?