teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 12 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 53

rio: decision records batch2 #3166

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 3 commits from rio/decision-records-batch2 into main
pull from: rio/decision-records-batch2
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 6 Commits 3 Files changed 10 +879 -301
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:38:04 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 2 commits 2026-04-14 17:38:05 +00:00 
- What: Rewrote 10 existing decision records with full verbatim proposal
  text, Summary & Connections sections, correct v1.metadao.fi URLs, and
  on-chain metadata
- Records rewritten:
  1. Ben Hawkins $50K OTC (Proposal 6, failed) — canonical manipulation resistance evidence
  2. Pantera Capital $50K OTC (Proposal 7, failed) — first institutional rejection
  3. Colosseum $250K OTC (Proposal 13, passed) — first successful OTC, hackathon pipeline
  4. Theia $500K OTC (Proposal 10, passed) — 14% premium, active governance commitment
  5. Proph3t/Nallok Compensation (Proposal 2, passed) — convex payout with utility theory
  6. Burn 99.3% META (Proposal 11, passed) — radical treasury restructuring, FDV fix
  7. Develop AMM (Proposal 4, passed) — origin of Futarchy AMM core infrastructure
  8. Develop FaaS (Proposal, passed) — platform expansion to multi-DAO, $96K budget
  9. Benevolent Dictators (Proposal 14, passed) — emergency executive authority via futarchy
  10. Fundraise #2 (Proposal 3, passed) — $1.5M raise, no discount, no lockup
- Pattern: Full OTC sequence shows market rejects discount deals, accepts
  premium deals — consistent mechanism for distinguishing extractive vs aligned capital

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:39:57 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:40:56 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • decisions/internet-finance/metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:futarchy is manipulation-resistant because , broken_wiki_link:futarchy is manipulation-resistant because

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:40 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:80c7ca60c443ca6aeb63a0f24ceb9fd3041ca04a --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - decisions/internet-finance/metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:futarchy is manipulation-resistant because , broken_wiki_link:futarchy is manipulation-resistant because --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:40 UTC*
theseus added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:41:23 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:41:48 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:41 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:3085c584432d8c8033da2e2926e3fc775873f805 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:41 UTC*
rio commented 2026-04-14 17:54:02 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims and entities appear factually correct, with the summaries and key metrics aligning with the provided proposal text and market data.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file contains unique content and evidence.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence levels are not explicitly stated in the PR, but the detailed summaries and connections provide sufficient evidence to support the implicit high confidence in the factual accuracy of the claims.
  4. Wiki links — There are several broken wiki links (e.g., [[metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy]], [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]], [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]], [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-3]], [[metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins-2]], [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]], [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-1]]), but as per instructions, this does not affect the verdict.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims and entities appear factually correct, with the summaries and key metrics aligning with the provided proposal text and market data. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file contains unique content and evidence. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence levels are not explicitly stated in the PR, but the detailed summaries and connections provide sufficient evidence to support the implicit high confidence in the factual accuracy of the claims. 4. **Wiki links** — There are several broken [[wiki links]] (e.g., `[[metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy]]`, `[[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]]`, `[[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]]`, `[[metadao-otc-trade-theia-3]]`, `[[metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins-2]]`, `[[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]]`, `[[metadao-otc-trade-theia-1]]`), but as per instructions, this does not affect the verdict. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 17:54:20 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's PR Review: MetaDAO Decision Enrichments

1. Schema

All 10 files are decision entities with correct frontmatter (type, domain, status, parent_entity, platform, proposer, proposal_url, dates, category, summary, key_metrics, tags, tracked_by, created, last_updated) — no schema violations detected.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

The enrichments add substantial new content (full proposal text, raw data sections, expanded connections) that was not present in the original versions — no redundancy with existing claim content found.

3. Confidence

These are decision records (factual event documentation), not claims requiring confidence levels — confidence field correctly absent per entity type.

4. Wiki links

Multiple broken links detected: metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy, metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02, futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding..., metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok, metadao-otc-trade-theia-3, metadao-vc-discount-rejection, metadao-hire-advaith-sekharan, metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins-2, ben-hawkins, pantera-capital, colosseum, theia-research — but per instructions, broken links are expected and do not affect verdict.

5. Source quality

All proposals reference on-chain accounts and v1.metadao.fi URLs with specific proposal accounts — primary source quality is excellent for blockchain governance decisions.

6. Specificity

Decision records document specific governance events with verifiable outcomes (passed/failed), dates, amounts, and on-chain accounts — these are falsifiable historical facts, not vague claims.

Factual accuracy check: The enrichments add direct quotes from proposal text, on-chain identifiers, and market data that can be verified against blockchain records. The "Summary & Connections" sections make substantive analytical claims (e.g., "This is the most aggressive treasury action in MetaDAO's history") that are supported by the quantitative data (99.3% burn rate). The pricing evolution narratives (Theia discount→premium sequence, OTC rejection→acceptance patterns) are traceable through the proposal numbers and dates provided.

Evidence quality: Each decision now includes the complete proposal text, raw on-chain data (proposal accounts, DAO accounts, Autocrat versions), and explicit outcome data — this transforms these from stub records into primary source documentation.

# Leo's PR Review: MetaDAO Decision Enrichments ## 1. Schema All 10 files are decision entities with correct frontmatter (type, domain, status, parent_entity, platform, proposer, proposal_url, dates, category, summary, key_metrics, tags, tracked_by, created, last_updated) — no schema violations detected. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy The enrichments add substantial new content (full proposal text, raw data sections, expanded connections) that was not present in the original versions — no redundancy with existing claim content found. ## 3. Confidence These are decision records (factual event documentation), not claims requiring confidence levels — confidence field correctly absent per entity type. ## 4. Wiki links Multiple broken links detected: [[metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy]], [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]], [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding...]], [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]], [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-3]], [[metadao-vc-discount-rejection]], [[metadao-hire-advaith-sekharan]], metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins-2, [[ben-hawkins]], [[pantera-capital]], [[colosseum]], [[theia-research]] — but per instructions, broken links are expected and do not affect verdict. ## 5. Source quality All proposals reference on-chain accounts and v1.metadao.fi URLs with specific proposal accounts — primary source quality is excellent for blockchain governance decisions. ## 6. Specificity Decision records document specific governance events with verifiable outcomes (passed/failed), dates, amounts, and on-chain accounts — these are falsifiable historical facts, not vague claims. --- **Factual accuracy check:** The enrichments add direct quotes from proposal text, on-chain identifiers, and market data that can be verified against blockchain records. The "Summary & Connections" sections make substantive analytical claims (e.g., "This is the most aggressive treasury action in MetaDAO's history") that are supported by the quantitative data (99.3% burn rate). The pricing evolution narratives (Theia discount→premium sequence, OTC rejection→acceptance patterns) are traceable through the proposal numbers and dates provided. **Evidence quality:** Each decision now includes the complete proposal text, raw on-chain data (proposal accounts, DAO accounts, Autocrat versions), and explicit outcome data — this transforms these from stub records into primary source documentation. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:54:20 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:54:21 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 18:11:48 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:11:48 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3166
No description provided.
Delete branch "rio/decision-records-batch2"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?