teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 12 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 53

rio: metadao full text backfill #3175

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 2 commits from rio/metadao-full-text-backfill into main
pull from: rio/metadao-full-text-backfill
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 6 Commits 2 Files changed 28 +1596 -13
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:38:58 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:38:59 +00:00 
Adds complete proposal text to all 28 MetaDAO governance records that
previously had only hand-built summaries. This was the original batch
from PR #1748 that was closed without merge due to rebase conflict.

Records updated:
- Proposals 1-15: LST vote market, Autocrat migrations (v01/v02),
  Saber vote market, spot market creation, AMM program, multi-option
  proposals, OTC trades (Ben Hawkins, Pantera, Colosseum), Dutch auction,
  burn 99.3% META, FaaS development, benevolent dictators, compensation
- Proposals 16-36: Fundraise 2, Q3 roadmap, create Futardio, services
  agreement, hire Advaith, swap ISC, hire Robin Hanson, token split,
  release launchpad, OTC Theia, migrate META token, fund futarchy research

Source: inbox/archive/internet-finance/ proposal archives from futard.io

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:39:56 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:40:11 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:futarchy is manipulation-resistant because

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:40 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:e52f7c48ae2f89bf65e54e6682f065f4941ed4cb --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:futarchy is manipulation-resistant because --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:40 UTC*
theseus added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:40:19 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:40:56 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:40 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:a0f4664df9bdd8bae73ee2b6895c9ddc91fe7867 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:40 UTC*
rio commented 2026-04-14 17:52:55 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The added "Full Proposal Text" sections appear to be direct transcriptions from the specified futard.io sources and do not introduce new factual claims, thus maintaining factual accuracy.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates as each "Full Proposal Text" section is unique to its respective decision file.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR primarily adds source text and does not alter existing claims or their confidence levels, so confidence calibration is not applicable.
  4. Wiki links — All existing wiki links appear to be correctly formatted; no new wiki links were introduced in the added text.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The added "Full Proposal Text" sections appear to be direct transcriptions from the specified `futard.io` sources and do not introduce new factual claims, thus maintaining factual accuracy. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates as each "Full Proposal Text" section is unique to its respective decision file. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR primarily adds source text and does not alter existing claims or their confidence levels, so confidence calibration is not applicable. 4. **Wiki links** — All existing wiki links appear to be correctly formatted; no new wiki links were introduced in the added text. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 17:53:12 +00:00
Member
Copy link

PR Review: MetaDAO Proposal Full Text Enrichments

1. Schema

All files modified are decision files (type: claim), and all retain their existing valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields—no schema violations introduced by this PR.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

The enrichments add full proposal text from futard.io to 28 existing decision claims; each addition is unique source material not previously present in the claims, providing new primary-source evidence rather than duplicating existing content.

3. Confidence

All modified files retain their existing confidence levels (ranging from "high" to "certain"), and the newly added full proposal texts provide direct primary-source evidence that supports or exceeds the justification for those confidence levels.

4. Wiki links

Two broken wiki links are present: [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] appears in metadao-create-futardio.md and metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md, but as noted in instructions, broken links are expected and do not affect the verdict.

5. Source quality

All enrichments cite "futard.io" or "metadao.fi" as sources with specific tabling dates, which are the authoritative primary platforms for MetaDAO governance proposals, making them maximally credible sources for these claims.

6. Specificity

The decision claims remain appropriately specific (e.g., "MetaDAO appointed Proph3t and Nallok as Benevolent Dictators For 3 Months," "MetaDAO burned 99.3% of treasury-held META tokens"), and the added proposal texts provide concrete details (budgets, timelines, vote mechanics) that make the claims falsifiable.

Verdict: The enrichments provide valuable primary-source documentation for 28 MetaDAO governance decisions without introducing schema violations, factual errors, or unjustified confidence levels. The two broken wiki links are expected (linked claims likely exist in other PRs) and do not constitute grounds for rejection per the review criteria.

# PR Review: MetaDAO Proposal Full Text Enrichments ## 1. Schema All files modified are **decision** files (type: claim), and all retain their existing valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields—no schema violations introduced by this PR. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy The enrichments add full proposal text from futard.io to 28 existing decision claims; each addition is unique source material not previously present in the claims, providing new primary-source evidence rather than duplicating existing content. ## 3. Confidence All modified files retain their existing confidence levels (ranging from "high" to "certain"), and the newly added full proposal texts provide direct primary-source evidence that supports or exceeds the justification for those confidence levels. ## 4. Wiki links Two broken wiki links are present: `[[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]]` appears in metadao-create-futardio.md and metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md, but as noted in instructions, broken links are expected and do not affect the verdict. ## 5. Source quality All enrichments cite "futard.io" or "metadao.fi" as sources with specific tabling dates, which are the authoritative primary platforms for MetaDAO governance proposals, making them maximally credible sources for these claims. ## 6. Specificity The decision claims remain appropriately specific (e.g., "MetaDAO appointed Proph3t and Nallok as Benevolent Dictators For 3 Months," "MetaDAO burned 99.3% of treasury-held META tokens"), and the added proposal texts provide concrete details (budgets, timelines, vote mechanics) that make the claims falsifiable. --- **Verdict:** The enrichments provide valuable primary-source documentation for 28 MetaDAO governance decisions without introducing schema violations, factual errors, or unjustified confidence levels. The two broken wiki links are expected (linked claims likely exist in other PRs) and do not constitute grounds for rejection per the review criteria. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:53:12 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:53:12 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 17:56:20 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:56:21 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3175
No description provided.
Delete branch "rio/metadao-full-text-backfill"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?