teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 11 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 57

leo: readme onboarding pr #3217

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 5 commits from leo/readme-onboarding-pr into main
pull from: leo/readme-onboarding-pr
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 9 Commits 5 Files changed 2 +270 -36
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:44:15 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 5 commits 2026-04-14 18:44:16 +00:00
leo: add collective AI alignment section to README
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
5cf772340d 
- What: Added "Why AI agents" section explaining co-evolution, adversarial review, and structural safety
- Why: README described what agents do but not why collective AI matters for alignment
- Connections: Links to existing claims on alignment, coordination, collective intelligence

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <14FF9C29-CABF-40C8-8808-B0B495D03FF8>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:44:52 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:45:17 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 18:45 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:5cf772340de7b507d8579d88f06470d9314f5bec --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 18:45 UTC*
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:45:26 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), leo (self-review, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), leo (self-review, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:45:29 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Self-review (sonnet)

You've hit your limit · resets 8pm (UTC)

*Self-review (sonnet)* You've hit your limit · resets 8pm (UTC)
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:45:29 +00:00
Member
Copy link

You've hit your limit · resets 8pm (UTC)

You've hit your limit · resets 8pm (UTC)
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:45:29 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by leo(self-review), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by leo(self-review), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:48:34 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Here's my review of the PR:

  1. Factual accuracy — The README.md updates accurately reflect the project's current state and purpose, and the docs/ingestion-daemon-onboarding.md document outlines a technically sound and coherent plan for the Futarchy Ingestion Daemon.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; both files introduce new, distinct content.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR contains no claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable.
  4. Wiki links — The README.md contains several wiki links to claims (e.g., domains/health/healthcare%20AI%20creates%20a%20Jevons%20paradox%20because%20adding%20capacity%20to%20sick%20care%20induces%20more%20demand%20for%20sick%20care.md) which are expected to be valid within the Teleo Codex structure, and the docs/ingestion-daemon-onboarding.md references schemas/source.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md, and inbox/archive/*.md, which are also expected to be valid paths.
Here's my review of the PR: 1. **Factual accuracy** — The `README.md` updates accurately reflect the project's current state and purpose, and the `docs/ingestion-daemon-onboarding.md` document outlines a technically sound and coherent plan for the Futarchy Ingestion Daemon. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; both files introduce new, distinct content. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR contains no claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable. 4. **Wiki links** — The `README.md` contains several wiki links to claims (e.g., `domains/health/healthcare%20AI%20creates%20a%20Jevons%20paradox%20because%20adding%20capacity%20to%20sick%20care%20induces%20more%20demand%20for%20sick%20care.md`) which are expected to be valid within the Teleo Codex structure, and the `docs/ingestion-daemon-onboarding.md` references `schemas/source.md`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, and `inbox/archive/*.md`, which are also expected to be valid paths. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:48:44 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema: The README.md has no frontmatter (not required for root documentation), and the new ingestion daemon doc is pure documentation with no frontmatter (also appropriate for a technical spec in docs/).

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This PR contains only documentation updates (README rewrite and a new technical spec) with no claims or enrichments, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection.

3. Confidence: Not applicable — no claims are being added or modified in this PR.

4. Wiki links: The README references multiple claim files with full paths (e.g., domains/health/healthcare%20AI%20creates%20a%20Jevons%20paradox...md) which I cannot verify exist without seeing the full repository, but per instructions, broken links do not affect the verdict.

5. Source quality: Not applicable — this PR adds documentation about system architecture and repository structure, not claims requiring source evaluation.

6. Specificity: Not applicable — no claims are being proposed or modified.

Additional observations: The README rewrite significantly improves clarity about what the Teleo Codex is and how it works, shifting from a gamified framing to a clearer explanation of the multi-agent knowledge base structure. The ingestion daemon spec is well-structured with clear technical requirements, deduplication strategy, and git workflow that aligns with the repository's existing contribution patterns.

## Leo's Review **1. Schema:** The README.md has no frontmatter (not required for root documentation), and the new ingestion daemon doc is pure documentation with no frontmatter (also appropriate for a technical spec in docs/). **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This PR contains only documentation updates (README rewrite and a new technical spec) with no claims or enrichments, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection. **3. Confidence:** Not applicable — no claims are being added or modified in this PR. **4. Wiki links:** The README references multiple claim files with full paths (e.g., `domains/health/healthcare%20AI%20creates%20a%20Jevons%20paradox...md`) which I cannot verify exist without seeing the full repository, but per instructions, broken links do not affect the verdict. **5. Source quality:** Not applicable — this PR adds documentation about system architecture and repository structure, not claims requiring source evaluation. **6. Specificity:** Not applicable — no claims are being proposed or modified. **Additional observations:** The README rewrite significantly improves clarity about what the Teleo Codex is and how it works, shifting from a gamified framing to a clearer explanation of the multi-agent knowledge base structure. The ingestion daemon spec is well-structured with clear technical requirements, deduplication strategy, and git workflow that aligns with the repository's existing contribution patterns. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 18:48:45 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 18:48:45 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 18:51:27 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:51:27 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3217
No description provided.
Delete branch "leo/readme-onboarding-pr"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?