- What: Updated [[old|alias]] style wiki links in hybrid-value and layered architecture claims
that still pointed to deleted trilemma file. Previous fix only caught [[old]] style links.
- Why: Leo review caught these — piped alias links weren't matched by replace_all.
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <2EA8DBCB-A29B-43E8-B726-45E571A1F3C8>
- What: Deleted standalone trilemma claim, enriched Leo's early-conviction pricing claim
(core/grand-strategy/) with auction theory grounding: Vickrey (1961) truthful revelation,
Myerson (1981) revenue-maximization mismatch, Milgrom & Weber (1982) hybrid-value distinction.
Added LBP row to mechanism comparison table. Updated wiki links in hybrid-value and layered
architecture claims + launch mechanism musing to point to Leo's claim.
- Why: ~80% overlap with Leo's cross-domain synthesis (PR #34). My contribution is the
theoretical explanation for WHY the trilemma is structural — auction theory grounding
that strengthens the existing claim rather than duplicating it.
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <2EA8DBCB-A29B-43E8-B726-45E571A1F3C8>
- What: Three developing musings drawing from existing claims to work through open questions
1. Leverage role in futarchy — is leverage the binding constraint on governance accuracy? How to bet on it via OMFG? Draws from permissionless leverage claim, Minsky risk, selection effects.
2. Optimal team token + community airdrop structure — generalizes Position #6 beyond Omnipair. Milestone vesting vs time-based, Mint Governor, airdrop-as-engagement-ladder. Draws from coin-price-as-objective, meritocratic token economics, fanchise engagement ladder.
3. Best launch mechanism / price discovery — central question of my domain. Current lean: batch auction → bonding curve with retroactive conviction rewards. But concerns about batch-to-curve transition exploitability and community formation dynamics. Draws from Doppler claim, trilemma framework, futarchy governance claims.
- Why: Building internal scratchpad for working toward positions and outputs. Each musing identifies claim candidates and data needs.
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <2EA8DBCB-A29B-43E8-B726-45E571A1F3C8>
- What: Three interconnected claims building the analytical framework for evaluating token launch mechanisms
1. Launch mechanism trilemma (shill-proof × community-aligned × price-discovering) — no existing mechanism achieves all three
2. Token launches as hybrid-value auctions — why standard auction theory results point to wrong mechanisms
3. Layered launch architecture — separate quality governance, pricing, liquidity, and community rewards across mechanism layers
- Why: Derived from critical analysis of Doppler (PR #31), pump.fun, MetaDAO/futard.io, batch auctions, and auction theory (Vickrey, Myerson, Milgrom & Weber). Cory's challenge on Doppler's true-believer penalty exposed the need for a formal evaluation framework. These claims are the core of the mechanism design competency web.
- Connections: Extends Doppler dutch-auction claim, connects to futarchy governance claims, bridges to optimal governance mixing claim in foundations
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <2EA8DBCB-A29B-43E8-B726-45E571A1F3C8>
