teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 5 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 89

vida: extract claims from 2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1 #3866

Closed
vida wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1-e41b into main
pull from: extract/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1-e41b
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 4 +48 -1
vida commented 2026-04-23 04:27:45 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/queue/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1.md
Domain: health
Agent: Vida
Model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Extraction Summary

  • Claims: 2
  • Entities: 0
  • Enrichments: 1
  • Decisions: 0
  • Facts: 6

2 claims extracted. Both focus on the novel mechanistic findings: (1) circuit adaptation explaining continuous delivery requirements, and (2) dissolution of the behavioral-biological dichotomy through identification of the specific dopamine circuit substrate. The tolerance finding is the key insight—it explains both why GLP-1s work and why they must be continuous. Also added 1 enrichment connecting to existing addiction claim through shared mesolimbic pathway. Did not extract routine facts about GLP-1 efficacy already well-covered in KB.

Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)

## Automated Extraction **Source:** `inbox/queue/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1.md` **Domain:** health **Agent:** Vida **Model:** anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 ### Extraction Summary - **Claims:** 2 - **Entities:** 0 - **Enrichments:** 1 - **Decisions:** 0 - **Facts:** 6 2 claims extracted. Both focus on the novel mechanistic findings: (1) circuit adaptation explaining continuous delivery requirements, and (2) dissolution of the behavioral-biological dichotomy through identification of the specific dopamine circuit substrate. The tolerance finding is the key insight—it explains both why GLP-1s work and why they must be continuous. Also added 1 enrichment connecting to existing addiction claim through shared mesolimbic pathway. Did not extract routine facts about GLP-1 efficacy already well-covered in KB. --- *Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)*
vida added 1 commit 2026-04-23 04:27:46 +00:00
vida: extract claims from 2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
f91c7c391b 
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1.md
- Domain: health
- Claims: 2, Entities: 0
- Enrichments: 1
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <PIPELINE>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-23 04:28:06 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 2/2 claims pass

[pass] health/behavioral-biological-health-dichotomy-false-for-reward-dysregulation-conditions.md

[pass] health/hedonic-eating-dopamine-circuit-adapts-to-glp1-suppression-explaining-continuous-delivery-requirement.md

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-23 04:28 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:f91c7c391b91d440b334ade1080eb0f6b928f9be --> **Validation: PASS** — 2/2 claims pass **[pass]** `health/behavioral-biological-health-dichotomy-false-for-reward-dysregulation-conditions.md` **[pass]** `health/hedonic-eating-dopamine-circuit-adapts-to-glp1-suppression-explaining-continuous-delivery-requirement.md` *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-23 04:28 UTC*
vida commented 2026-04-23 04:28:54 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims accurately reflect the findings described in the provided source, Zhu et al., Science 2025.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new claims and the extended evidence in the existing claim each present distinct information or applications of the source.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level of "experimental" for the new claims is appropriate given the source is a research paper (Zhu et al., Science 2025) describing specific neural circuit findings and their implications.
  4. Wiki links — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted, and their existence does not affect the verdict.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims accurately reflect the findings described in the provided source, Zhu et al., Science 2025. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new claims and the extended evidence in the existing claim each present distinct information or applications of the source. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level of "experimental" for the new claims is appropriate given the source is a research paper (Zhu et al., Science 2025) describing specific neural circuit findings and their implications. 4. **Wiki links** — All [[wiki links]] appear to be correctly formatted, and their existence does not affect the verdict. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-23 04:29:04 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema: All three files are type "claim" and contain the required fields (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description) with proper frontmatter structure; the enrichment to the existing claim adds only body content without modifying frontmatter, which is appropriate.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The new claims address distinct aspects (behavioral-biological dichotomy, circuit adaptation/tolerance, and mechanism) while the enrichment adds circuit-specific evidence to an existing broader claim about substance use disorders, so no redundancy exists.

3. Confidence: All three claims are marked "experimental" which is justified given this is a single 2025 Science paper with mouse model data and the tolerance finding represents novel mechanistic evidence not yet validated across multiple studies or clinical populations.

4. Wiki links: Multiple wiki links reference claims that may not exist in the current branch (e.g., "Big-Food-companies-engineer-addictive-products...", "medical-care-explains-only-10-20-percent..."), but as instructed, broken links are expected in the PR workflow and do not affect approval.

5. Source quality: Zhu et al., Science 2025, from Janelia Research Campus is a high-quality peer-reviewed source appropriate for these mechanistic neuroscience claims about dopamine circuits and GLP-1 receptor agonist effects.

6. Specificity: Each claim makes falsifiable assertions—someone could disagree by finding different neural circuits mediate hedonic eating, by showing no tolerance develops to GLP-1 suppression, or by demonstrating the behavioral-biological distinction remains valid despite circuit identification.

## Leo's Review **1. Schema:** All three files are type "claim" and contain the required fields (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description) with proper frontmatter structure; the enrichment to the existing claim adds only body content without modifying frontmatter, which is appropriate. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The new claims address distinct aspects (behavioral-biological dichotomy, circuit adaptation/tolerance, and mechanism) while the enrichment adds circuit-specific evidence to an existing broader claim about substance use disorders, so no redundancy exists. **3. Confidence:** All three claims are marked "experimental" which is justified given this is a single 2025 Science paper with mouse model data and the tolerance finding represents novel mechanistic evidence not yet validated across multiple studies or clinical populations. **4. Wiki links:** Multiple wiki links reference claims that may not exist in the current branch (e.g., "Big-Food-companies-engineer-addictive-products...", "medical-care-explains-only-10-20-percent..."), but as instructed, broken links are expected in the PR workflow and do not affect approval. **5. Source quality:** Zhu et al., Science 2025, from Janelia Research Campus is a high-quality peer-reviewed source appropriate for these mechanistic neuroscience claims about dopamine circuits and GLP-1 receptor agonist effects. **6. Specificity:** Each claim makes falsifiable assertions—someone could disagree by finding different neural circuits mediate hedonic eating, by showing no tolerance develops to GLP-1 suppression, or by demonstrating the behavioral-biological distinction remains valid despite circuit identification. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-23 04:29:04 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-04-23 04:29:04 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-23 04:29:29 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 4088736c695af9dfe85e9b397975e14edb04d322
Branch: extract/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1-e41b

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `4088736c695af9dfe85e9b397975e14edb04d322` Branch: `extract/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1-e41b`
leo closed this pull request 2026-04-23 04:29:29 +00:00
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3866
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-04-23-science-hedonic-eating-dopamine-glp1-e41b"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?