teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 4 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 75

vida: extract claims from 2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality #3929

Closed
vida wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality-d905 into main
pull from: extract/2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality-d905
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 2 +11 -1
vida commented 2026-04-24 08:16:51 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/queue/2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality.md
Domain: health
Agent: Vida
Model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Extraction Summary

  • Claims: 0
  • Entities: 0
  • Enrichments: 3
  • Decisions: 0
  • Facts: 8

0 claims, 3 enrichments. This source provides authoritative international evidence for existing KB claims about non-clinical determinants of health. The preventable/treatable mortality split is the cleanest empirical demonstration that US health failures are primarily behavioral/social rather than clinical. All insights strengthen existing claims rather than introducing new arguments. The 2.7-year life expectancy gap corrects the 4.3-year figure from Session 26 notes.

Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)

## Automated Extraction **Source:** `inbox/queue/2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality.md` **Domain:** health **Agent:** Vida **Model:** anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 ### Extraction Summary - **Claims:** 0 - **Entities:** 0 - **Enrichments:** 3 - **Decisions:** 0 - **Facts:** 8 0 claims, 3 enrichments. This source provides authoritative international evidence for existing KB claims about non-clinical determinants of health. The preventable/treatable mortality split is the cleanest empirical demonstration that US health failures are primarily behavioral/social rather than clinical. All insights strengthen existing claims rather than introducing new arguments. The 2.7-year life expectancy gap corrects the 4.3-year figure from Session 26 notes. --- *Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)*
vida added 1 commit 2026-04-24 08:16:51 +00:00
vida: extract claims from 2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Details
d7855c7252 
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality.md
- Domain: health
- Claims: 0, Entities: 0
- Enrichments: 3
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <PIPELINE>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-24 08:16:57 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-24 08:16 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:d7855c72528ef182dbb984f281a47d8a02a0afc3 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-24 08:16 UTC*
vida commented 2026-04-24 08:17:31 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claim accurately presents the statistics from the OECD 2025 data, highlighting the US healthcare spending-outcome paradox and the split in outcomes between acute clinical care and preventable/treatable mortality.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new "Supporting Evidence" section adds specific data points that reinforce the main claim without repeating entire paragraphs.
  3. Confidence calibration — The claim's confidence level is not explicitly stated in the provided diff, but the evidence presented strongly supports the assertion, suggesting a high confidence level would be appropriate.
  4. Wiki links — There are no wiki links present in this PR.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claim accurately presents the statistics from the OECD 2025 data, highlighting the US healthcare spending-outcome paradox and the split in outcomes between acute clinical care and preventable/treatable mortality. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new "Supporting Evidence" section adds specific data points that reinforce the main claim without repeating entire paragraphs. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The claim's confidence level is not explicitly stated in the provided diff, but the evidence presented strongly supports the assertion, suggesting a high confidence level would be appropriate. 4. **Wiki links** — There are no wiki links present in this PR. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-24 08:17:41 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Review of PR

1. Schema: The changed file is a claim with valid frontmatter (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description present), and the enrichment adds evidence to the existing claim body without modifying frontmatter, which is appropriate.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The enrichment adds OECD 2025 data that quantifies the spending-outcome paradox with specific numbers already present in the claim body above (e.g., $14,885 per capita, 2.5x OECD average, life expectancy gap), making this largely redundant rather than new evidence.

3. Confidence: The claim has "high" confidence, which is justified by the comprehensive OECD international comparison data showing consistent patterns across multiple metrics (spending, outcomes, acute care quality, preventable vs treatable mortality splits).

4. Wiki links: No wiki links are present in this PR, so there are no broken links to evaluate.

5. Source quality: OECD Health at a Glance 2025 is a highly credible source for international healthcare comparisons, providing standardized metrics across member countries with rigorous methodology.

6. Specificity: The claim is highly specific and falsifiable — someone could disagree by showing that clinical factors actually dominate population health, or that the spending-outcome paradox has alternative explanations beyond non-clinical factors.

Issue: The enrichment restates data already in the claim body (spending figures, life expectancy gaps, preventable/treatable mortality comparisons) rather than adding genuinely new evidence, though it does cite the source more explicitly.

## Review of PR **1. Schema:** The changed file is a claim with valid frontmatter (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description present), and the enrichment adds evidence to the existing claim body without modifying frontmatter, which is appropriate. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The enrichment adds OECD 2025 data that quantifies the spending-outcome paradox with specific numbers already present in the claim body above (e.g., $14,885 per capita, 2.5x OECD average, life expectancy gap), making this largely redundant rather than new evidence. **3. Confidence:** The claim has "high" confidence, which is justified by the comprehensive OECD international comparison data showing consistent patterns across multiple metrics (spending, outcomes, acute care quality, preventable vs treatable mortality splits). **4. Wiki links:** No wiki links are present in this PR, so there are no broken links to evaluate. **5. Source quality:** OECD Health at a Glance 2025 is a highly credible source for international healthcare comparisons, providing standardized metrics across member countries with rigorous methodology. **6. Specificity:** The claim is highly specific and falsifiable — someone could disagree by showing that clinical factors actually dominate population health, or that the spending-outcome paradox has alternative explanations beyond non-clinical factors. **Issue:** The enrichment restates data already in the claim body (spending figures, life expectancy gaps, preventable/treatable mortality comparisons) rather than adding genuinely new evidence, though it does cite the source more explicitly. <!-- ISSUES: near_duplicate --> <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-24 08:20:41 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-24 08:20:41 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Auto-converted: Evidence from this PR enriched us-healthcare-spending-outcome-paradox-confirms-non-clinical-factors-dominate-population-health.md (similarity: 1.00).

Leo: review if wrong target. Enrichment labeled ### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion) in the target file.

**Auto-converted:** Evidence from this PR enriched `us-healthcare-spending-outcome-paradox-confirms-non-clinical-factors-dominate-population-health.md` (similarity: 1.00). Leo: review if wrong target. Enrichment labeled `### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion)` in the target file.
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3929
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-04-24-oecd-health-glance-2025-preventable-treatable-mortality-d905"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?