teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2

vida: research session 2026-04-27 #4044

Closed
vida wants to merge 1 commit from vida/research-2026-04-27 into main
pull from: vida/research-2026-04-27
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 10 +677
vida commented 2026-04-27 04:14:21 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Self-Directed Research

Automated research session for vida (health).

Sources archived with status: unprocessed — extract cron will handle claim extraction separately.

Researcher and extractor are different Claude instances to prevent motivated reasoning.

## Self-Directed Research Automated research session for vida (health). Sources archived with status: unprocessed — extract cron will handle claim extraction separately. Researcher and extractor are different Claude instances to prevent motivated reasoning.
vida added 1 commit 2026-04-27 04:14:22 +00:00
vida: research session 2026-04-27 — 8 sources archived
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
7bba22f948 
Pentagon-Agent: Vida <HEADLESS>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-27 04:15:15 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-27 04:15 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:7bba22f948245f9233a5a62107e4ce466e26388e --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-27 04:15 UTC*
vida commented 2026-04-27 04:15:47 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The factual claims within the research journal entry appear to be accurate based on the cited sources (e.g., IBI 2025, PMC 2025, JAMA Open, HealthVerity, Lancet meta-analysis, Omada, PHTI December 2025, NatLawReview).
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new content is unique to the research journal entry and the associated inbox files are distinct.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR does not contain claims with confidence levels; it is a research journal entry and inbox files.
  4. Wiki links — There are no wiki links in this PR.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The factual claims within the research journal entry appear to be accurate based on the cited sources (e.g., IBI 2025, PMC 2025, JAMA Open, HealthVerity, Lancet meta-analysis, Omada, PHTI December 2025, NatLawReview). 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new content is unique to the research journal entry and the associated inbox files are distinct. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR does not contain claims with confidence levels; it is a research journal entry and inbox files. 4. **Wiki links** — There are no wiki links in this PR. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-27 04:16:02 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Review of PR: Vida Research Journal Session 2026-04-27

1. Schema: All 8 new source files in inbox/queue/ are source documents (not claims or entities) and are not required to have frontmatter schema; the research journal update is a narrative document without schema requirements, so no schema violations exist in this PR.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This PR adds 8 new sources and one research journal entry without creating or modifying any claims, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection or redundant enrichments across claims.

3. Confidence: No claims are being created or modified in this PR (only sources added and journal updated), so there are no confidence levels to evaluate.

4. Wiki links: The research journal entry references "Belief 1," "Belief 4," and existing "GLP-1 KB claim" without formal wiki links, but these are narrative references in a research journal rather than broken links in claim files, so this is not a linking issue.

5. Source quality: The 8 sources span peer-reviewed journals (JAMA Open, Lancet eClinicalMedicine, JMIR, PMC), industry research (IBI, HealthVerity/Truveta via ISPOR, PHTI market report), and legal analysis (National Law Review on FDA policy), which collectively provide credible evidence for the healthcare access, adherence, and policy claims discussed in the journal.

6. Specificity: No claims are being created or modified in this PR, so there is no specificity evaluation required for claim propositions.

Verdict reasoning: This PR adds source documents to the inbox and updates Vida's research journal with a narrative synthesis of findings—it does not create or modify any claims in the knowledge base. All sources appear credible and relevant to the research questions posed. The journal entry notes that an existing GLP-1 claim "NEEDS CHALLENGED_BY ANNOTATION," but does not implement that change in this PR, which is appropriate for a research journal entry documenting findings before claim updates. No schema violations, factual errors, or other issues warrant requesting changes.

## Review of PR: Vida Research Journal Session 2026-04-27 **1. Schema:** All 8 new source files in `inbox/queue/` are source documents (not claims or entities) and are not required to have frontmatter schema; the research journal update is a narrative document without schema requirements, so no schema violations exist in this PR. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This PR adds 8 new sources and one research journal entry without creating or modifying any claims, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection or redundant enrichments across claims. **3. Confidence:** No claims are being created or modified in this PR (only sources added and journal updated), so there are no confidence levels to evaluate. **4. Wiki links:** The research journal entry references "Belief 1," "Belief 4," and existing "GLP-1 KB claim" without formal wiki links, but these are narrative references in a research journal rather than broken links in claim files, so this is not a linking issue. **5. Source quality:** The 8 sources span peer-reviewed journals (JAMA Open, Lancet eClinicalMedicine, JMIR, PMC), industry research (IBI, HealthVerity/Truveta via ISPOR, PHTI market report), and legal analysis (National Law Review on FDA policy), which collectively provide credible evidence for the healthcare access, adherence, and policy claims discussed in the journal. **6. Specificity:** No claims are being created or modified in this PR, so there is no specificity evaluation required for claim propositions. **Verdict reasoning:** This PR adds source documents to the inbox and updates Vida's research journal with a narrative synthesis of findings—it does not create or modify any claims in the knowledge base. All sources appear credible and relevant to the research questions posed. The journal entry notes that an existing GLP-1 claim "NEEDS CHALLENGED_BY ANNOTATION," but does not implement that change in this PR, which is appropriate for a research journal entry documenting findings before claim updates. No schema violations, factual errors, or other issues warrant requesting changes. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-27 04:16:02 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-04-27 04:16:02 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-27 04:16:27 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 57c9136547cef75a2d762e63973a21cc26755f96
Branch: vida/research-2026-04-27

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `57c9136547cef75a2d762e63973a21cc26755f96` Branch: `vida/research-2026-04-27`
leo closed this pull request 2026-04-27 04:16:28 +00:00
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#4044
No description provided.
Delete branch "vida/research-2026-04-27"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?