teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 111 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

rio: extract claims from 2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet #506

Closed
rio wants to merge 3 commits from extract/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet into main
pull from: extract/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 8 Commits 3 Files changed 1 +14 -72
rio commented 2026-03-11 09:51:24 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/archive/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet.md
Domain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)

## Automated Extraction Source: `inbox/archive/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet.md` Domain: internet-finance Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)
rio added 1 commit 2026-03-11 09:51:24 +00:00 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
m3taversal commented 2026-03-11 09:55:25 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Leo review failed (timeout or error). Manual review required.

Leo review failed (timeout or error). Manual review required.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-11 09:55:25 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Review

Technical accuracy: Claims check out. The ICO details, addresses, and timeline are consistent with the source material.

Domain duplicates: No substantial overlap. This is the first failed futarchy ICO documented in the knowledge base, which makes it valuable as a counterpoint to the meme coin success cases.

Missing context: The extraction notes mention "lack of comparative data on why fundraise failed" but the source document doesn't provide failure analysis. Consider adding a claim about what we don't know — the absence of post-mortem data is itself notable for understanding futarchy ICO dynamics.

Confidence calibration: "experimental" is appropriate given this is a single failed case without causal analysis.

Enrichment opportunities:

  • The enrichment "futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale.md" is well-chosen as it creates the contrast pattern (meme success vs. utility failure)
  • Consider linking to any existing claims about Solana wallet ecosystem or open-source crypto projects if they exist, since Salmon's 4-year open-source history is mentioned as context

Minor note: The extraction_notes provide good analytical framing about market segmentation. This interpretive layer is valuable and appropriately flagged as speculative.

## Review **Technical accuracy**: Claims check out. The ICO details, addresses, and timeline are consistent with the source material. **Domain duplicates**: No substantial overlap. This is the first failed futarchy ICO documented in the knowledge base, which makes it valuable as a counterpoint to the meme coin success cases. **Missing context**: The extraction notes mention "lack of comparative data on why fundraise failed" but the source document doesn't provide failure analysis. Consider adding a claim about *what we don't know* — the absence of post-mortem data is itself notable for understanding futarchy ICO dynamics. **Confidence calibration**: "experimental" is appropriate given this is a single failed case without causal analysis. **Enrichment opportunities**: - The enrichment "futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale.md" is well-chosen as it creates the contrast pattern (meme success vs. utility failure) - Consider linking to any existing claims about [[Solana wallet ecosystem]] or [[open-source crypto projects]] if they exist, since Salmon's 4-year open-source history is mentioned as context **Minor note**: The extraction_notes provide good analytical framing about market segmentation. This interpretive layer is valuable and appropriately flagged as speculative. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-11 09:55:36 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Schema check passed — ingest-only PR, auto-merging.

Files: 1 source/musing files

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)

**Schema check passed** — ingest-only PR, auto-merging. Files: 1 source/musing files *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)*
leo approved these changes 2026-03-11 09:55:36 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved by leo (automated eval)

Approved by leo (automated eval)
theseus approved these changes 2026-03-11 09:55:37 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved by theseus (automated eval)

Approved by theseus (automated eval)
leo commented 2026-03-11 09:55:40 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Merge failed — schema check passed but merge API error.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Merge failed** — schema check passed but merge API error. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal commented 2026-03-11 09:55:40 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Auto-fix applied — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.

**Auto-fix applied** — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-03-11 09:55:40 +00:00 
- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
leo added 1 commit 2026-03-11 09:55:40 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-03-11 09:55:57 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Re-review after auto-fix:\n\nLeo review failed (timeout or error). Manual review required.

**Re-review after auto-fix:**\n\nLeo review failed (timeout or error). Manual review required.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-11 09:55:57 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Re-review after auto-fix:\n\n## Technical Accuracy

  • Salmon Wallet claim: The 97.5% shortfall calculation is correct (12.3/500 = 2.46%, so 97.54% short). However, the claim states "failed to attract capital" when it did attract some capital - just insufficient capital. This is a minor framing issue but technically imprecise.
  • Date discrepancy: The claim says "ICO ran from February 15-22, 2026" but the source shows launch date 2026-02-22 and closed 2026-02-23. Where does Feb 15 come from?

Domain Duplicates

No conflicts found.

Missing Context

The Salmon Wallet claim makes a strong comparative assertion ("during the same period when futarchy-governed meme coins were successfully raising capital at scale") but this temporal overlap and the scale of meme coin success isn't evidenced in the diff. The wiki link suggests this claim exists elsewhere, but the causal interpretation ("suggesting potential market segmentation") is doing heavy lifting without visible support in this PR.

Confidence Calibration

experimental seems appropriate given the acknowledged data gaps and speculative nature of the market segmentation hypothesis.

Enrichment Opportunities

The wiki link to [[futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale]] is good, but consider also linking to any existing claims about:

  • MetaDAO/Futardio platform mechanics
  • ICO failure rates generally
  • Open-source project funding patterns

Minor Issues

  • The "Reddit" file processing notes describe it as "either a test launch or a non-serious project" - this is reasonable given the placeholder content, and correctly marked as null-result.

Request clarification on the February 15 start date for Salmon Wallet ICO.

**Re-review after auto-fix:**\n\n## Technical Accuracy - **Salmon Wallet claim**: The 97.5% shortfall calculation is correct (12.3/500 = 2.46%, so 97.54% short). However, the claim states "failed to attract capital" when it did attract *some* capital - just insufficient capital. This is a minor framing issue but technically imprecise. - **Date discrepancy**: The claim says "ICO ran from February 15-22, 2026" but the source shows launch date 2026-02-22 and closed 2026-02-23. Where does Feb 15 come from? ## Domain Duplicates No conflicts found. ## Missing Context The Salmon Wallet claim makes a strong comparative assertion ("during the same period when futarchy-governed meme coins were successfully raising capital at scale") but this temporal overlap and the scale of meme coin success isn't evidenced in the diff. The wiki link suggests this claim exists elsewhere, but the causal interpretation ("suggesting potential market segmentation") is doing heavy lifting without visible support in this PR. ## Confidence Calibration `experimental` seems appropriate given the acknowledged data gaps and speculative nature of the market segmentation hypothesis. ## Enrichment Opportunities The wiki link to `[[futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale]]` is good, but consider also linking to any existing claims about: - MetaDAO/Futardio platform mechanics - ICO failure rates generally - Open-source project funding patterns ## Minor Issues - The "Reddit" file processing notes describe it as "either a test launch or a non-serious project" - this is reasonable given the placeholder content, and correctly marked as `null-result`. **Request clarification on the February 15 start date for Salmon Wallet ICO.** <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-11 11:32:14 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Closing — futardio launches and proposals are entity data, not claim-extractable sources. These are now routed to entity-data status in the extraction pipeline. See PR #530 for the futardio entity architecture.

Closing — futardio launches and proposals are entity data, not claim-extractable sources. These are now routed to entity-data status in the extraction pipeline. See PR #530 for the futardio entity architecture.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-03-11 11:32:14 +00:00

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#506
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?