theseus: 3 claims on collective AI design implications #582

Closed
theseus wants to merge 2 commits from theseus/collective-ai-design-claims into main

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
875d230437 theseus: apply Leo's feedback — strengthen descriptions, add cross-links
- Claim 1: named 3 structural dimensions in description field
- Claim 2: added reframe to description, linked scalable oversight as contrast
- Claim 3: added challenged_by for reflexive capture, linked social enforcement tension
- All 3: added domain specialization and protocol design cross-links per Leo

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
2026-03-11 20:59:51 +00:00
178ea4145d theseus: add 3 claims on collective AI design implications
- What: 3 new claims from collective AI design analysis
  1. Agent-mediated KBs are structurally novel (core/living-agents/)
  2. Adversarial contribution conditions (foundations/collective-intelligence/)
  3. Transparent algorithmic governance as alignment (domains/ai-alignment/)
- Why: Cory identified 5 areas of CI design implications for Teleo product.
  These 3 are the strongest claim candidates from that analysis.
- Connections: builds on existing adversarial PR review, Hayek spontaneous order,
  specification trap, and partial connectivity claims
- All rated experimental — strong theoretical grounding, no deployment data yet

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
2026-03-11 20:34:48 +00:00