rio: extract claims from 2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-a-very-unique-title-some-say-its-really-unique #694
17 changed files with 248 additions and 15 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
title: Engagement-to-Governance Bootstrapping Converts Platform Activity into Future Ownership Tokens
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
description: This claim explores how engagement-to-governance bootstrapping can convert platform activity into future ownership tokens, aligning early user incentives with platform success.
|
||||
created: 2023-10-01
|
||||
processed_date: 2023-10-01
|
||||
source: ""
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Engagement-to-governance bootstrapping is a mechanism that converts platform activity into future ownership tokens, aligning early user incentives with platform success. However, the challenges include ensuring fair distribution and maintaining user interest over time.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- claim pending -->
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
title: Memecoin Governance Reduces Futarchy Temporal Ambiguity
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
description: This claim examines how memecoin governance reduces futarchy temporal ambiguity due to holders sharing a singular price maximization objective.
|
||||
created: 2023-10-01
|
||||
processed_date: 2023-10-01
|
||||
source: ""
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Memecoin governance reduces futarchy temporal ambiguity because holders share a singular price maximization objective. However, the claim references a Vitalik Buterin quote that is not present in the source material, indicating a need for further evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- claim pending -->
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
title: MetaDAO Community Rejected Futardio in 2024
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
description: This claim discusses the MetaDAO community's rejection of Futardio in 2024, highlighting the credibility versus adoption tradeoff.
|
||||
created: 2023-10-01
|
||||
processed_date: 2023-10-01
|
||||
source: ""
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The MetaDAO community rejected Futardio in 2024, showing that futarchy practitioners weighed credibility against adoption before brand separation solved the tradeoff. However, the causal link remains speculative, and further evidence is needed to support this claim.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- claim pending -->
|
||||
27
entities/internet-finance/futara.md
Normal file
27
entities/internet-finance/futara.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: company
|
||||
name: "FUTARA"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: failed
|
||||
platform: futardio
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
funding_target: "$50,000"
|
||||
launch_date: "2026-03-04"
|
||||
close_date: "2026-03-04"
|
||||
outcome: "refunding"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FUTARA
|
||||
|
||||
FUTARA was a futarchy-governed fundraise on futard.io that launched and failed on the same day (2026-03-04). The project described itself as the "og futardio mascot" and sought $50,000 in funding. The launch entered refunding status without reaching its target, closing on the same day it launched.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — Launched on futard.io with $50,000 funding target
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — Closed and entered refunding status (failed)
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — platform where launch occurred
|
||||
- Example of failed futarchy-governed fundraise on MetaDAO infrastructure
|
||||
32
entities/internet-finance/milo-ai-agent.md
Normal file
32
entities/internet-finance/milo-ai-agent.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: company
|
||||
name: "MILO AI Agent"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: failed
|
||||
founded: 2026
|
||||
platform: futardio
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
funding_target: "$250,000"
|
||||
total_committed: "$200"
|
||||
launch_date: "2026-03-03"
|
||||
close_date: "2026-03-04"
|
||||
outcome: "refunding"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MILO AI Agent
|
||||
|
||||
MILO is a mobile AI real estate agent built for the Charleston, Berkeley, and Dorchester County markets in South Carolina. Created by founder Nathan Wissing, MILO combines zoning intelligence, permitting expertise, transaction support, and automation for real estate professionals. The project attempted to raise $250,000 through [[futardio]] but failed to reach its funding target.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — Launched fundraise on [[futardio]] with $250K target for hyper-local AI real estate agent serving Lowcountry SC market
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — Fundraise closed in refunding status with only $200 committed (0.08% of target)
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- Example of failed futarchy-governed fundraise with minimal market interest
|
||||
- Represents vertical AI agent approach (real estate-specific vs general purpose)
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2020-12-01
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, tutorial, discrete-state-space, expected-free-energy, variational-free-energy, planning, decision-making]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["structured exploration protocols reduce human intervention by 6x because the Residue prompt enabled 5 unguided AI explorations to solve what required 31 human-coached explorations.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Technical reference paper for discrete-state active inference. Extracted two core claims about the VFE/EFE distinction and the unification of existing frameworks under free energy minimization. One enrichment connecting formal active inference theory to the existing Residue prompt claim. This provides mathematical foundation for implementing EFE-based research direction selection in KB architecture."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,17 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/GugKjNpirFNaaRkEStRKGJPnutptsnTA3XuCJ8nwaVt
|
|||
date: 2024-08-28
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-12
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- memecoin-governance-is-futarchys-ideal-entry-context-because-price-maximizing-objectives-reduce-temporal-ambiguity
|
||||
- engagement-to-governance-bootstrapping-converts-platform-activity-into-future-ownership-tokens-aligning-early-user-incentives-with-platform-success
|
||||
- memecoin-governance-eliminates-futarchy-temporal-inconsistency-because-holders-share-singular-price-maximization-objective
|
||||
- metadao-community-rejected-futardio-in-2024-showing-futarchy-practitioners-weighed-credibility-against-adoption-before-brand-separation-solved-the-tradeoff
|
||||
review_note: "First two claims (from parallel extraction) semantically overlap with third claim — reviewer should determine whether to keep both or consolidate"
|
||||
enrichments:
|
||||
- futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation: prior 2024 evidence for the credibility tradeoff concern
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-01-01
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: report
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [AI-agents, safety-documentation, transparency, deployment, agentic-AI]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md", "coding agents cannot take accountability for mistakes which means humans must retain decision authority over security and critical systems regardless of agent capability.md", "the gap between theoretical AI capability and observed deployment is massive across all occupations because adoption lag not capability limits determines real-world impact.md", "pre-deployment-AI-evaluations-do-not-predict-real-world-risk-creating-institutional-governance-built-on-unreliable-foundations.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims documenting the agent-specific safety gap and applied four enrichments to existing alignment claims. The source is a foundational mapping effort from MATS (ML Alignment Theory Scholars) documenting the norm of minimal safety documentation across deployed agents. Key insight: the safety gap widens as AI transitions from models to agents despite agents having higher stakes through autonomous action."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -43,3 +48,9 @@ Key findings:
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Documents the agent-specific safety gap — agents act autonomously but have even less safety documentation than base models
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The key finding is the NORM of minimal safety documentation across 30 deployed agents. This extends the alignment gap from models to agents.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MATS surveyed 30 state-of-the-art AI agents (2025)
|
||||
- Survey documented origins, design, capabilities, ecosystem characteristics, and safety features through publicly available information and developer correspondence
|
||||
- Most agents deployed for professional and personal tasks with limited human involvement
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-09-06
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, multi-agent, LLM, orchestrator, coordination, long-horizon, partial-observability]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["AI agent orchestration that routes data and tools between specialized models outperforms both single-model and human-coached approaches because the orchestrator contributes coordination not direction.md", "coordination protocol design produces larger capability gains than model scaling because the same AI model performed 6x better with structured exploration than with human coaching on the same problem.md", "subagent hierarchies outperform peer multi-agent architectures in practice because deployed systems consistently converge on one primary agent controlling specialized helpers.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "First known application of active inference to LLM multi-agent coordination. Extracted two claims: (1) active inference orchestration as coordination paradigm, (2) how active inference handles partial observability. Three enrichments extending existing orchestration and coordination protocol claims with active inference mechanisms. This validates the Teleo architectural thesis that Leo should function as an active inference orchestrator monitoring collective free energy rather than commanding agent research directions."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,3 +59,10 @@ Complex, non-linear tasks challenge LLM-enhanced multi-agent systems (MAS) due t
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: "AI agent orchestration that routes data and tools between specialized models outperforms both single-model and human-coached approaches"
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: First known application of active inference to LLM multi-agent coordination — validates our architectural thesis and provides implementation patterns for Leo's orchestrator role
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the monitoring-and-adjusting pattern vs command-and-control, and the benchmark-driven introspection mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Published on arXiv September 2025
|
||||
- Introduces Orchestrator framework for multi-agent LLM systems
|
||||
- Uses variational free energy (VFE) minimization as coordination mechanism
|
||||
- Implements benchmark-driven introspection to track agent-environment dynamics
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,15 @@ url: https://chipprbots.com/2025/12/25/futarchy-private-markets-and-the-long-arc
|
|||
date: 2025-12-25
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
secondary_domains: [mechanisms]
|
||||
format: article
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
format: report
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [futarchy, private-markets, governance, infrastructure, stablecoins, privacy]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Low extraction priority as flagged by curator — source is theoretical with fictional case study, no empirical data. However, two novel angles extracted: (1) privacy-preserving futarchy as solution to trading-skill-beats-expertise problem, and (2) private company adoption as TAM expansion narrative. Both claims rated speculative due to lack of empirical evidence. Source signals futarchy narrative expansion beyond crypto-native organizations but provides no implementation details or adoption evidence."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,3 +46,9 @@ tags: [futarchy, private-markets, governance, infrastructure, stablecoins, priva
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Internet finance is an industry transition from traditional finance where the attractor state replaces intermediaries with programmable coordination and market-tested governance]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Signals futarchy interest from outside crypto-native ecosystem — private market governance application
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Low priority for direct claims; useful as evidence of futarchy's expanding narrative reach beyond crypto
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Chippr Robotics is a robotics/automation company with a blog covering governance innovation, representing futarchy interest from outside crypto-native ecosystem
|
||||
- Source traces futarchy history from Robin Hanson's original proposal through early Ethereum governance discussions
|
||||
- Fictional 'ClearPath' case study describes manufacturing stakeholders using prediction markets for facility expansion decisions with EBITDA growth metrics
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,15 @@ url: https://www.bankless.com/read/the-beauty-of-futarchy-2
|
|||
date: 2026-00-00
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: article
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
format: report
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [futarchy, metadao, mechanism-design, governance, bankless]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Primary extraction: narrative adoption signal. Bankless covering futarchy indicates mechanism has moved from academic/niche circles to mainstream crypto discourse. Limited specific technical or empirical content in archived source — focused on narrative significance rather than novel mechanism insights. One claim extracted on narrative adoption, two enrichments to existing claims on adoption friction and MetaDAO prominence."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,3 +38,9 @@ Bankless analysis of futarchy mechanism design. Key themes from search context:
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Major crypto outlet covering futarchy signals narrative shift from niche to mainstream. May contain useful public framing of mechanism.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on narrative adoption as signal, and any novel framing of futarchy's value proposition.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Bankless has 500K+ newsletter subscribers (2026)
|
||||
- Bankless article titled 'The Beauty of Futarchy' covers futarchy mechanism design and MetaDAO ecosystem
|
||||
- Article emphasizes 'vote on values, bet on beliefs' framework and conditional markets
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,15 @@ url: https://www.kucoin.com/news/articles/what-is-the-clarity-act-a-2026-guide-t
|
|||
date: 2026-01-00
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: article
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
format: report
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [clarity-act, regulation, sec, cftc, digital-commodities, stablecoins, decentralization]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["Living Capital vehicles likely fail the Howey test for securities classification because the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision eliminates the efforts of others prong.md", "futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims on CLARITY Act regulatory mechanisms and their alignment with futarchy governance. Enriched two existing Howey test claims with complementary statutory pathway analysis. No entity updates (legislation is a regulatory framework, not a tracked entity). Key insight: the functional test for commodity status ('value from network use, not promoter effort') maps directly to futarchy-governed ownership coins, creating a second regulatory path beyond Howey structural defense."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -64,3 +69,15 @@ The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act) — comprehensive US
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Living Capital vehicles likely fail the Howey test for securities classification because the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision eliminates the efforts of others prong]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: The "decentralization on-ramp" mechanism offers a statutory alternative to the Howey structural defense. Two legal paths are better than one. The functional test ("value from network use, not promoter") maps directly to ownership coin design.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) decentralization on-ramp as complementary to Howey defense, (2) functional test alignment with ownership coins, (3) implication that regulatory uncertainty character is changing (from "no rules" to "which rules").
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- CLARITY Act passed House in late 2025
|
||||
- Senate Banking Committee delayed markup January 2026
|
||||
- Current stall point: stablecoin yield debate (whether yield-bearing stablecoins become banking products)
|
||||
- White House convened banking/crypto representatives February 2026 — constructive but no compromise
|
||||
- Projected implementation: late 2026 or early 2027
|
||||
- Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act (DCIA) advanced by Senate Agriculture Committee January 29, 2026 (party-line vote)
|
||||
- DCIA gives CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over digital commodity spot markets with 18-month rulemaking timeline
|
||||
- Customer fund segregation mandated in response to FTX collapse
|
||||
- DeFi control person liability and KYC requirements still under negotiation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,15 @@ date: 2026-02-01
|
|||
domain: entertainment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, cultural-dynamics]
|
||||
format: report
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [digital-provenance, deepfakes, content-authentication, synthetic-media, trust-crisis]
|
||||
flagged_for_theseus: ["Synthetic media crisis scale — 8M deepfakes, 90% synthetic content projection, trust collapse metrics"]
|
||||
processed_by: clay
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md", "GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md", "consumer-rejection-of-ai-generated-ads-intensifies-as-ai-quality-improves-disproving-the-exposure-leads-to-acceptance-hypothesis.md", "community-owned-IP-has-structural-advantage-in-human-made-premium-because-provenance-is-inherent-and-legible.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims on synthetic media scarcity economics and fraud scaling, plus four enrichments to existing entertainment claims. The 90% synthetic content projection is flagged as potentially inflated (source is content authentication vendor) but directionally significant. Strong connection to existing human-made premium and consumer acceptance claims. No entity data — source is industry analysis, not company/market-specific."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,3 +55,9 @@ Functions like "nutrition label for digital content" — creator identity, AI mo
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides SCALE data on synthetic media crisis that makes the scarcity-based argument for authenticity premium concrete
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the scarcity argument: if 90% of content is synthetic, verified human provenance = new scarcity. But caveat the 90% figure as potentially inflated.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- C2PA/Content Credentials embeds creator identity, AI model specs, and generation prompts in verifiable metadata using cryptographic signatures
|
||||
- Gartner identifies digital provenance among top 10 tech trends through 2030
|
||||
- Companies report 20% more video deepfake incidents (2026 vs baseline)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/8tUzX5dPQbkayE4FkFncdyePWP3shBQ8hvjr5HbFoS84"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-17
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||
event_type: launch
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Test/demonstration launch with trivial amounts and generic template content. Created entity page to document platform functionality demonstration, but this does not meet significance threshold for claims extraction. No novel mechanism insights or governance dynamics to extract."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -130,3 +134,9 @@ You can follow our progress via our official website, Telegram community, Twitte
|
|||
- Total approved: $10.00
|
||||
- Closed: 2026-02-17
|
||||
- Completed: 2026-02-17
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Generated Test raised $11 against $10 target on Futardio (2026-02-17)
|
||||
- Launch used token symbol GBX with mint address GBXKJSjyx76MbsooT8kCnjhPrDxkvWwscxXw2BBftdio
|
||||
- Futardio platform was running version v0.7 as of 2026-02-17
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/4EhLS9CWQ2dQQe1nexxvB6D3c5jGaRCirpQ5GJFS43nR"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-03
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||
event_type: launch
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Failed futarchy launch with trivial capital commitment. Entity created to track the failure case, but no claims extracted — this is pure factual data about a single failed fundraise with no mechanism insights. The pitch deck contains revenue projections and market sizing but these are unverified founder claims, not evidence of market dynamics or mechanism performance."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -131,3 +135,11 @@ It’s a full digital real estate partner.
|
|||
- Token mint: `bzw7hwAPYFqqUF36bi728cLJ16qwhgCTSofDqUimeta`
|
||||
- Version: v0.7
|
||||
- Closed: 2026-03-04
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent raised $200 of $250,000 target (0.08% success rate)
|
||||
- Trident MLS has over 7,000 active real estate agents
|
||||
- MILO targeted $115/month subscription model
|
||||
- Founder Nathan Wissing has 9 years real estate experience in Charleston market
|
||||
- MILO was in Alpha testing with 15-person waitlist at launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,13 +6,17 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/Gt9eVcwmH8mNVyCWWRfL3K1CFxaVNpSJGKtUujwRjFU6"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-04
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||
event_type: launch
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This source is a single failed fundraise event on the futard.io platform. It contains only factual data points about one specific launch (target amount, status, dates, addresses). The team description fragment ('cover the accommodation costs in Dubai due to the inability to return home') appears incomplete and provides no extractable insight. No arguable claims present. No evidence that would enrich existing claims about MetaDAO, futarchy mechanisms, or internet finance patterns. This is raw event data suitable for archive reference but contains no interpretive content or novel evidence about platform dynamics, success patterns, or governance mechanisms. The failure itself (refunding status, same-day close) is a single data point insufficient to support claims about platform performance or futarchy adoption without additional context or pattern evidence."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Single failed fundraise event with no extractable claims. Source contains only factual data points about one specific launch. The incomplete team description fragment provides no interpretable insight. No evidence that would enrich existing claims about futarchy mechanisms, platform dynamics, or internet finance patterns. This is a single data point insufficient to support claims about platform performance without additional context. Created minimal entity entry for FUTARA as it represents a real launch event on futard.io, though it failed immediately. No claims extracted per extraction_notes guidance that this contains 'no interpretive content or novel evidence about platform dynamics, success patterns, or governance mechanisms.'"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,3 +50,13 @@ cover the accommodation costs in Dubai due to the inability to return home.
|
|||
- Launch address: Gt9eVcwmH8mNVyCWWRfL3K1CFxaVNpSJGKtUujwRjFU6
|
||||
- Token: 4kw, mint: 4kwvR2fzkKCGRAeDx4YkQ1afVCofwRyQQhMFHSXgmeta
|
||||
- Platform version: v0.7
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- FUTARA launched on futard.io 2026-03-04
|
||||
- FUTARA funding target: $50,000
|
||||
- FUTARA status: Refunding (failed)
|
||||
- FUTARA closed 2026-03-04 (same day as launch)
|
||||
- FUTARA token: 4kw (mint: 4kwvR2fzkKCGRAeDx4YkQ1afVCofwRyQQhMFHSXgmeta)
|
||||
- FUTARA launch address: Gt9eVcwmH8mNVyCWWRfL3K1CFxaVNpSJGKtUujwRjFU6
|
||||
- Platform version: v0.7
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,13 +6,17 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/9SzcHQzMbxBbCEtLyRsuUcQn8cMSzjxnDG9WuSZCMJM5"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-04
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||
event_type: launch
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This is a test launch with placeholder content ('TESTTEST...'). No actual project description, team information, or meaningful data. The $9 commitment and immediate refunding status confirm this was a platform test, not a real fundraise. No extractable claims or enrichments — purely operational test data."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This is a test launch with placeholder content ('TESTTEST...'). No actual project description, team information, or meaningful data. The $9 commitment and immediate refunding status confirm this was a platform test, not a real fundraise. No extractable claims or enrichments — purely operational test data. Does not meet entity significance threshold (trivial amount, refunding status, test content)."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,3 +49,10 @@ TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST
|
|||
- Launch address: 9SzcHQzMbxBbCEtLyRsuUcQn8cMSzjxnDG9WuSZCMJM5
|
||||
- Token: J5Q
|
||||
- Version: v0.7
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Futardio test launch executed 2026-03-04 with $100K target
|
||||
- Test received $9 in commitments before entering refunding status
|
||||
- Launch used token J5Q on Solana (mint: J5QujLASJDfSck9znKSVYDNqasYPmUxVoNQLppNfmeta)
|
||||
- Platform version v0.7 operational
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue