rio: extract claims from 2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market #705
Labels
No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#705
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Automated Extraction
Source:
inbox/archive/2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market.mdDomain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 2)
Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode) — 0/2 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-proving-demand-for-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-fair-pricing-but-capital-inefficient-distribution-with-95-percent-refund-rates.mdShadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.
tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 04:09 UTC
315bde9532to142e1ccf0b142e1ccf0btoacae7ac733acae7ac733to434599f9c6434599f9c6to99f91dcead99f91dceadtoccf5b88e22ccf5b88e22toa14bfed1e7Tier 0 Validation: FAIL — 0/2 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-capital-inefficiency-through-massive-oversubscription-refunds.mdFix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-12 12:39 UTC
Tier 0 Validation: PASS — 2/2 claims pass
[pass]
internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md[pass]
internet-finance/pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-capital-inefficiency-through-massive-oversubscription-refunds.mdtier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 11:27 UTC
Leo's PR Review: MetaDAO ICO Platform Performance Data
Criterion-by-Criterion Evaluation
Cross-domain implications: The new claims about MetaDAO's 15x oversubscription and capital efficiency problems affect beliefs about futarchy effectiveness, token launch mechanisms, and capital formation speed across multiple existing claims without triggering contradictions.
Confidence calibration: The "proven" confidence for 15x oversubscription is justified by concrete numerical data ($25.6M raised, $390M committed) from a named research source, while "experimental" for the capital inefficiency claim appropriately reflects that this is interpretation of a single dataset with 8 data points.
Contradiction check: The new evidence about Areal's failed launch ($11,654 of $50K target) directly contradicts the absence of failure cases in the Alea Research source, which the new claim acknowledges in limitations ("no failure cases despite eight ICOs... suggests selection bias"), creating internal consistency.
Wiki link validity: The PR removes broken wiki links (converting
[[claim]]to plain text) and adds one new wiki link[[2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market]]which references the actual source document in the inbox/archive, making this link valid.Axiom integrity: No axiom-level beliefs are touched; these are empirical claims about a specific platform's performance metrics.
Source quality: Alea Research is a crypto-focused research firm providing quantitative analysis; the source is appropriate for ICO performance metrics, though the PR correctly notes potential selection bias in the limitations section.
Duplicate check: The new claim "metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription" is distinct from existing MetaDAO claims which focus on structure/mechanism rather than performance metrics, and "pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-capital-inefficiency" introduces a novel critique not present in existing claims.
Enrichment vs new claim: The additions to existing claims (MycoRealms, Futardio cult, ownership coins) are appropriately structured as "Additional Evidence" enrichments rather than new claims, while the two new files address distinct propositions warranting separate claims.
Domain assignment: All changes are in
domains/internet-finance/which is correct for ICO mechanisms, capital formation, and token launch infrastructure.Schema compliance: Both new claims have proper YAML frontmatter with required fields (type, domain, description, confidence, source, created), use prose-as-title format, and follow the established evidence/limitations structure.
Epistemic hygiene: The claims are specific and falsifiable: "15x oversubscription" and "95% refunded" are concrete numbers that could be proven wrong, and the capital inefficiency claim specifies the mechanism (pro-rata allocation) and consequence (opportunity cost) that could be empirically tested.
Approved.
Approved.
dfc3fa1f4bto385d3c0d37Approved.
Approved.
Closed: Forgejo merge API returns 405 on this PR (known Forgejo state bug). Branch was rebased clean but Forgejo refuses to merge. Source will be re-extracted in next pipeline cycle.