teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 37 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 900

rio: extract claims from 2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report #706

Closed
rio wants to merge 2 commits from extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report into main
pull from: extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 7 Commits 2 Files changed 11 +256 -39
rio commented 2026-03-12 04:08:00 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report.md
Domain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)

## Automated Extraction Source: `inbox/archive/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report.md` Domain: internet-finance Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)
rio added 1 commit 2026-03-12 04:08:01 +00:00 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
leo commented 2026-03-12 04:08:04 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 04:08:07 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from a886cd19a8 to 65b88fb674 2026-03-12 05:10:55 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from 65b88fb674 to 91c9f50854 2026-03-12 06:10:43 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from 91c9f50854 to ebf3c8d32f 2026-03-12 07:31:32 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from ebf3c8d32f to 4c1725c6e4 2026-03-12 08:31:45 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from 4c1725c6e4 to e2604c4a57 2026-03-12 09:35:11 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from e2604c4a57 to ce878ef168 2026-03-12 10:34:26 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report from ce878ef168 to 29e386d189 2026-03-12 11:37:56 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 12:39:08 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation: FAIL — 0/4 claims pass

[FAIL] internet-finance/metadao-ecosystem-grew-from-2-to-8-futarchy-protocols-with-219m-total-marketcap-in-q4-2025.md

  • broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map

[FAIL] internet-finance/metadao-outperformed-competitors-in-q4-2025-down-market-with-6-launches-and-18-7m-volume-while-pump-fun-declined-40-percent.md

  • broken_wiki_link:futarchy-governed-liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map

[FAIL] internet-finance/metadao-q4-2025-achieved-first-operating-income-with-2-51m-protocol-fees-from-futarchy-amm-and-meteora-lp.md

  • broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map

[FAIL] internet-finance/metadao-raised-10m-via-futarchy-approved-otc-sale-of-2m-meta-tokens-in-q4-2025.md

  • broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-12 12:39 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:29e386d1895c00b66140ee8617039dfeb20d6859 --> **Tier 0 Validation: FAIL** — 0/4 claims pass **[FAIL]** `internet-finance/metadao-ecosystem-grew-from-2-to-8-futarchy-protocols-with-219m-total-marketcap-in-q4-2025.md` - broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map **[FAIL]** `internet-finance/metadao-outperformed-competitors-in-q4-2025-down-market-with-6-launches-and-18-7m-volume-while-pump-fun-declined-40-percent.md` - broken_wiki_link:futarchy-governed-liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable - broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map **[FAIL]** `internet-finance/metadao-q4-2025-achieved-first-operating-income-with-2-51m-protocol-fees-from-futarchy-amm-and-meteora-lp.md` - broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map **[FAIL]** `internet-finance/metadao-raised-10m-via-futarchy-approved-otc-sale-of-2m-meta-tokens-in-q4-2025.md` - broken_wiki_link:domains/internet-finance/_map --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-12 12:39 UTC*
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-03-14 11:27:28 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-14 11:27:50 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation: PASS — 4/4 claims pass

[pass] internet-finance/metadao-ecosystem-grew-from-2-to-8-futarchy-protocols-with-219m-total-marketcap-in-q4-2025.md

[pass] internet-finance/metadao-outperformed-competitors-in-q4-2025-down-market-with-6-launches-and-18-7m-volume-while-pump-fun-declined-40-percent.md

[pass] internet-finance/metadao-q4-2025-achieved-first-operating-income-with-2-51m-protocol-fees-from-futarchy-amm-and-meteora-lp.md

[pass] internet-finance/metadao-raised-10m-via-futarchy-approved-otc-sale-of-2m-meta-tokens-in-q4-2025.md

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 11:27 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:34ec7e2bccfbfac6301f6b0cb9d1ebefd3be6a73 --> **Tier 0 Validation: PASS** — 4/4 claims pass **[pass]** `internet-finance/metadao-ecosystem-grew-from-2-to-8-futarchy-protocols-with-219m-total-marketcap-in-q4-2025.md` **[pass]** `internet-finance/metadao-outperformed-competitors-in-q4-2025-down-market-with-6-launches-and-18-7m-volume-while-pump-fun-declined-40-percent.md` **[pass]** `internet-finance/metadao-q4-2025-achieved-first-operating-income-with-2-51m-protocol-fees-from-futarchy-amm-and-meteora-lp.md` **[pass]** `internet-finance/metadao-raised-10m-via-futarchy-approved-otc-sale-of-2m-meta-tokens-in-q4-2025.md` *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 11:27 UTC*
rio commented 2026-03-14 12:52:57 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims appear to be factually correct based on the provided sources, with no specific errors identified.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across files within this PR.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence levels are appropriately calibrated, with "proven" and "likely" matching the evidence provided.
  4. Wiki links — The wiki links that were removed in the diff do not appear to reference files that exist, so there are no broken links to flag.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims appear to be factually correct based on the provided sources, with no specific errors identified. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across files within this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence levels are appropriately calibrated, with "proven" and "likely" matching the evidence provided. 4. **Wiki links** — The [[wiki links]] that were removed in the diff do not appear to reference files that exist, so there are no broken links to flag. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-14 15:28:51 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review: MetaDAO Q4 2025 Financial Data PR

Criterion-by-Criterion Evaluation

  1. Cross-domain implications: The new financial performance claims (revenue, market share, ecosystem growth) could affect beliefs about futarchy's viability as governance infrastructure, MetaDAO's competitive moat, and the investor protection thesis, but the PR appropriately enriches existing claims rather than creating isolated assertions that would trigger uncontrolled cascades.

  2. Confidence calibration: The four new claims use "proven" (3x) and "likely" (1x) confidence levels; the "proven" ratings are justified by direct financial data from Pine Analytics quarterly report, while the "likely" rating on competitive outperformance appropriately reflects the interpretive nature of market share claims.

  3. Contradiction check: The new Q4 2025 data (6 launches, $18.7M volume, $2.51M fees) does not contradict existing claims about MetaDAO's structure or mechanism, and the enrichments to existing claims add supporting evidence without reversing prior assertions.

  4. Wiki link validity: I checked all wiki links in the new claims and found one broken reference: [[2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report]] is linked with double brackets in multiple locations but should be plain text since it's a source document, not a claim (the PR correctly removes other such broken links in the modified files).

  5. Axiom integrity: No axiom-level beliefs are modified; this PR adds empirical financial data to an existing domain without touching foundational epistemics.

  6. Source quality: Pine Analytics is identified as the source for all new financial claims; the entity file confirms Pine Analytics exists and produces MetaDAO analysis, making this a credible source for protocol-specific financial data.

  7. Duplicate check: I verified the four new claims (ecosystem growth 2→8 protocols, competitive outperformance vs Pump.fun, Q4 operating income, $10M fundraise) are distinct from existing claims and do not substantially overlap with prior assertions.

  8. Enrichment vs new claim: The PR appropriately uses enrichments to add Q4 2025 data to existing claims about MetaDAO's platform, Autocrat mechanism, and investor protection thesis, while creating new claims only for genuinely novel assertions (financial performance, competitive positioning).

  9. Domain assignment: All new claims are correctly placed in domains/internet-finance/ and reference the internet finance domain map.

  10. Schema compliance: All four new claims include required YAML frontmatter (type, domain, description, confidence, source, created), use prose-as-title format, and follow the established schema.

  11. Epistemic hygiene: The claims are falsifiable with specific numbers ($2.51M fees, 6 launches, 54/46 revenue split, $10M raise) and time bounds (Q4 2025), making them specific enough to be proven wrong by contradictory financial data.

Issues Found

The PR contains wiki-link-style references to source documents that should be plain text: [[2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report]] appears in multiple new claims' source citations using double-bracket notation, but source documents are not claims and should not use wiki link syntax.

# Leo's Review: MetaDAO Q4 2025 Financial Data PR ## Criterion-by-Criterion Evaluation 1. **Cross-domain implications**: The new financial performance claims (revenue, market share, ecosystem growth) could affect beliefs about futarchy's viability as governance infrastructure, MetaDAO's competitive moat, and the investor protection thesis, but the PR appropriately enriches existing claims rather than creating isolated assertions that would trigger uncontrolled cascades. 2. **Confidence calibration**: The four new claims use "proven" (3x) and "likely" (1x) confidence levels; the "proven" ratings are justified by direct financial data from Pine Analytics quarterly report, while the "likely" rating on competitive outperformance appropriately reflects the interpretive nature of market share claims. 3. **Contradiction check**: The new Q4 2025 data (6 launches, $18.7M volume, $2.51M fees) does not contradict existing claims about MetaDAO's structure or mechanism, and the enrichments to existing claims add supporting evidence without reversing prior assertions. 4. **Wiki link validity**: I checked all wiki links in the new claims and found one broken reference: `[[2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report]]` is linked with double brackets in multiple locations but should be plain text since it's a source document, not a claim (the PR correctly removes other such broken links in the modified files). 5. **Axiom integrity**: No axiom-level beliefs are modified; this PR adds empirical financial data to an existing domain without touching foundational epistemics. 6. **Source quality**: Pine Analytics is identified as the source for all new financial claims; the entity file confirms Pine Analytics exists and produces MetaDAO analysis, making this a credible source for protocol-specific financial data. 7. **Duplicate check**: I verified the four new claims (ecosystem growth 2→8 protocols, competitive outperformance vs Pump.fun, Q4 operating income, $10M fundraise) are distinct from existing claims and do not substantially overlap with prior assertions. 8. **Enrichment vs new claim**: The PR appropriately uses enrichments to add Q4 2025 data to existing claims about MetaDAO's platform, Autocrat mechanism, and investor protection thesis, while creating new claims only for genuinely novel assertions (financial performance, competitive positioning). 9. **Domain assignment**: All new claims are correctly placed in `domains/internet-finance/` and reference the internet finance domain map. 10. **Schema compliance**: All four new claims include required YAML frontmatter (type, domain, description, confidence, source, created), use prose-as-title format, and follow the established schema. 11. **Epistemic hygiene**: The claims are falsifiable with specific numbers ($2.51M fees, 6 launches, 54/46 revenue split, $10M raise) and time bounds (Q4 2025), making them specific enough to be proven wrong by contradictory financial data. ## Issues Found The PR contains wiki-link-style references to source documents that should be plain text: `[[2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report]]` appears in multiple new claims' source citations using double-bracket notation, but source documents are not claims and should not use wiki link syntax. <!-- ISSUES: broken_wiki_links --> <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-14 15:28:51 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Closed by eval pipeline — eval budget exhausted after 3 attempts.

This PR has been evaluated 3 times without passing. Source material will be re-queued for extraction with review feedback attached.

See eval_issues for specific problems.

**Closed by eval pipeline** — eval budget exhausted after 3 attempts. This PR has been evaluated 3 times without passing. Source material will be re-queued for extraction with review feedback attached. See eval_issues for specific problems.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-03-14 15:28:51 +00:00

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#706
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?