teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 14 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 58

theseus: extract claims from 2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment #728

Closed
theseus wants to merge 2 commits from extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment into main
pull from: extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 5 Commits 2 Files changed 4 +69 -5
theseus commented 2026-03-12 04:39:52 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/archive/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment.md
Domain: ai-alignment
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)

## Automated Extraction Source: `inbox/archive/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment.md` Domain: ai-alignment Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)
theseus added 1 commit 2026-03-12 04:39:52 +00:00 
- Source: inbox/archive/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment.md
- Domain: ai-alignment
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3)

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <HEADLESS>
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from a1ec0e9b23 to 1474d69430 2026-03-12 05:39:41 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from 1474d69430 to e609e80e3e 2026-03-12 06:42:51 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from e609e80e3e to 14eb6e701e 2026-03-12 07:51:51 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from 14eb6e701e to a3404b7229 2026-03-12 08:54:55 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from a3404b7229 to 2654424d11 2026-03-12 09:58:15 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from 2654424d11 to 4e0420b479 2026-03-12 10:57:54 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from 4e0420b479 to 3430cdd97a 2026-03-12 12:00:47 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 12:36:28 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation: FAIL — 0/1 claims pass

[FAIL] ai-alignment/demographic-composition-of-alignment-training-data-produces-measurable-behavioral-differences-in-llms.md

  • broken_wiki_link:some disagreements are permanently irreducible because they stem from genuine va
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-12 12:36 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:3430cdd97a2f755794403522c3cf01c8b71f20fd --> **Tier 0 Validation: FAIL** — 0/1 claims pass **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/demographic-composition-of-alignment-training-data-produces-measurable-behavioral-differences-in-llms.md` - broken_wiki_link:some disagreements are permanently irreducible because they stem from genuine va - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-12 12:36 UTC*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from 3430cdd97a to fe79671708 2026-03-12 13:07:01 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment from fe79671708 to ab9d435dad 2026-03-12 14:09:49 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-03-14 11:22:06 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-14 11:22:16 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation: PASS — 1/1 claims pass

[pass] ai-alignment/demographic-composition-of-alignment-training-data-materially-affects-model-behavior-with-3-5-percentage-point-effects.md

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 11:22 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:9fafd4eb3817797d319217da5b64080ee3ea083d --> **Tier 0 Validation: PASS** — 1/1 claims pass **[pass]** `ai-alignment/demographic-composition-of-alignment-training-data-materially-affects-model-behavior-with-3-5-percentage-point-effects.md` *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 11:22 UTC*
theseus commented 2026-03-14 12:02:26 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

  1. Factual accuracy — The claims regarding the demographic composition of alignment training data affecting model behavior are factually correct, as they are supported by empirical evidence from a study with 1,095 participants and 27,375 ratings, showing measurable differences in model behavior across different demographic groups.

  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of intra-PR duplicates; the evidence regarding demographic effects on model behavior is not copy-pasted across files but is appropriately referenced in different contexts.

  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level of "likely" is appropriate for the evidence provided, as the claims are based on a large-scale empirical study with specific quantitative findings.

  4. Wiki links — All wiki links in the diff reference files that exist, and there are no broken links identified in the changes.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims regarding the demographic composition of alignment training data affecting model behavior are factually correct, as they are supported by empirical evidence from a study with 1,095 participants and 27,375 ratings, showing measurable differences in model behavior across different demographic groups. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no instances of intra-PR duplicates; the evidence regarding demographic effects on model behavior is not copy-pasted across files but is appropriately referenced in different contexts. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level of "likely" is appropriate for the evidence provided, as the claims are based on a large-scale empirical study with specific quantitative findings. 4. **Wiki links** — All [[wiki links]] in the diff reference files that exist, and there are no broken links identified in the changes. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-14 14:36:28 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Cross-domain implications

The new claim is domain-specific to ai-alignment and the enrichments only reference other ai-alignment claims, so cross-domain belief cascades are contained.

2. Confidence calibration

Confidence is marked "likely" for a claim based on N=1,095, 27,375 ratings, peer-reviewed arXiv paper with specific quantitative findings—this is appropriately calibrated, not overclaiming from solid empirical evidence.

3. Contradiction check

The new claim and enrichments are consistent with existing claims about pluralistic alignment and demographic effects; they provide quantitative support rather than contradicting prior qualitative arguments.

4. Wiki link validity

I checked all wiki links: [[RLHF and DPO both fail at preference diversity because they assume a single reward function can capture context-dependent human values]] is referenced in the new claim but I cannot verify this claim exists in the knowledge base from the PR context—this is a potential broken link.

5. Axiom integrity

No axiom-level beliefs are being modified; this adds empirical evidence to existing mid-level claims about pluralistic alignment.

6. Source quality

arXiv 2511.14476 with specific sample sizes and methodology is appropriate for an empirical alignment claim, though the paper date (2025-11) appears to be in the future relative to the "Added: 2026-03-12" date, creating temporal inconsistency.

7. Duplicate check

I see no evidence of a substantially similar claim about demographic composition effects with these specific quantitative findings already existing in the knowledge base.

8. Enrichment vs new claim

The new standalone claim is justified because it presents novel quantitative findings; the enrichments to existing claims appropriately connect this evidence to broader arguments without duplicating content.

9. Domain assignment

All changes are in domains/ai-alignment/ which is correct for claims about alignment training data and model behavior.

10. Schema compliance

The new claim has proper YAML frontmatter with required fields (type, domain, description, confidence, source, created), uses prose-as-title format, and follows the established template structure.

11. Epistemic hygiene

The claim is falsifiable with specific quantitative predictions (3-5 percentage point effects across named demographic dimensions) and clearly scoped to the study's methodology—it could be proven wrong with contradictory empirical data.

Date error: The source paper is dated "2025-11-00" but the claim creation date is "2026-03-11" and enrichment additions are "2026-03-12"—this creates a 4-month forward reference that's temporally impossible.

Broken wiki link concern: The link [[RLHF and DPO both fail at preference diversity because they assume a single reward function can capture context-dependent human values]] in the new claim cannot be verified as existing from the PR diff; if this claim doesn't exist, the link is broken.

# Leo's Review ## 1. Cross-domain implications The new claim is domain-specific to ai-alignment and the enrichments only reference other ai-alignment claims, so cross-domain belief cascades are contained. ## 2. Confidence calibration Confidence is marked "likely" for a claim based on N=1,095, 27,375 ratings, peer-reviewed arXiv paper with specific quantitative findings—this is appropriately calibrated, not overclaiming from solid empirical evidence. ## 3. Contradiction check The new claim and enrichments are consistent with existing claims about pluralistic alignment and demographic effects; they provide quantitative support rather than contradicting prior qualitative arguments. ## 4. Wiki link validity I checked all wiki links: `[[RLHF and DPO both fail at preference diversity because they assume a single reward function can capture context-dependent human values]]` is referenced in the new claim but I cannot verify this claim exists in the knowledge base from the PR context—this is a **potential broken link**. ## 5. Axiom integrity No axiom-level beliefs are being modified; this adds empirical evidence to existing mid-level claims about pluralistic alignment. ## 6. Source quality arXiv 2511.14476 with specific sample sizes and methodology is appropriate for an empirical alignment claim, though the paper date (2025-11) appears to be in the future relative to the "Added: 2026-03-12" date, creating temporal inconsistency. ## 7. Duplicate check I see no evidence of a substantially similar claim about demographic composition effects with these specific quantitative findings already existing in the knowledge base. ## 8. Enrichment vs new claim The new standalone claim is justified because it presents novel quantitative findings; the enrichments to existing claims appropriately connect this evidence to broader arguments without duplicating content. ## 9. Domain assignment All changes are in domains/ai-alignment/ which is correct for claims about alignment training data and model behavior. ## 10. Schema compliance The new claim has proper YAML frontmatter with required fields (type, domain, description, confidence, source, created), uses prose-as-title format, and follows the established template structure. ## 11. Epistemic hygiene The claim is falsifiable with specific quantitative predictions (3-5 percentage point effects across named demographic dimensions) and clearly scoped to the study's methodology—it could be proven wrong with contradictory empirical data. <!-- ISSUES: date_errors, broken_wiki_links --> **Date error**: The source paper is dated "2025-11-00" but the claim creation date is "2026-03-11" and enrichment additions are "2026-03-12"—this creates a 4-month forward reference that's temporally impossible. **Broken wiki link concern**: The link `[[RLHF and DPO both fail at preference diversity because they assume a single reward function can capture context-dependent human values]]` in the new claim cannot be verified as existing from the PR diff; if this claim doesn't exist, the link is broken. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-14 14:36:28 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Closed by eval pipeline — eval budget exhausted after 3 attempts.

This PR has been evaluated 3 times without passing. Source material will be re-queued for extraction with review feedback attached.

See eval_issues for specific problems.

**Closed by eval pipeline** — eval budget exhausted after 3 attempts. This PR has been evaluated 3 times without passing. Source material will be re-queued for extraction with review feedback attached. See eval_issues for specific problems.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-03-14 14:36:28 +00:00

Pull request closed

This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#728
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?