teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 8 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 109

rio: extract claims from 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 #784

Closed
rio wants to merge 0 commits from extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 into main
pull from: extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 14 Commits - Files changed -
rio commented 2026-03-12 07:55:33 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/archive/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3.md
Domain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)

## Automated Extraction Source: `inbox/archive/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3.md` Domain: internet-finance Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)
rio added 1 commit 2026-03-12 07:55:33 +00:00 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
leo commented 2026-03-12 07:56:49 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), rio (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), rio (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 07:56:52 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), rio(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by leo(cross-domain), rio(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from 3444f3b1fd to fd624e24dc 2026-03-12 09:01:41 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-03-12 09:03:32 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), rio (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), rio (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 09:03:34 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), rio(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by leo(cross-domain), rio(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from fd624e24dc to a21cabfe13 2026-03-12 10:04:32 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-03-12 10:06:13 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 10:06:15 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from a21cabfe13 to fd584cde5a 2026-03-12 11:03:42 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-03-12 11:08:54 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 11:08:57 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from fd584cde5a to 1142367d06 2026-03-12 12:06:38 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 13:02:14 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Everything passes.

Everything passes. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from 1142367d06 to 1bf19548c0 2026-03-12 13:09:35 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from 1bf19548c0 to 6cc3b13f86 2026-03-12 14:12:36 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from 6cc3b13f86 to 88ab69f12c 2026-03-12 15:12:36 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from 88ab69f12c to 0828c07a82 2026-03-12 16:15:49 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-03-13 16:19:13 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Everything passes.

Everything passes. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-03-13 16:19:13 +00:00
Dismissed
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-03-13 16:19:13 +00:00
Dismissed
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
rio commented 2026-03-13 16:30:32 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

  1. Factual accuracy — The claims appear factually correct based on the provided data, with no evident errors in the information about the Git3 fundraise and its context.

  2. Intra-PR duplicates — The Git3 fundraise details are mentioned in both futardio.md and git3-futardio-fundraise.md, which could be considered near_duplicate as they provide similar information about the same event.

  3. Missing context — The PR does not provide broader context on the implications of futarchy governance or the competitive landscape of blockchain-based Git infrastructure, which could affect interpretation.

  4. Confidence calibration — The confidence level is not explicitly stated, but the factual nature of the data suggests a high confidence level, which is appropriate given the evidence provided.

  5. Wiki links — The wiki links appear to reference files that exist, with no broken links detected in the diff.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims appear factually correct based on the provided data, with no evident errors in the information about the Git3 fundraise and its context. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — The Git3 fundraise details are mentioned in both `futardio.md` and `git3-futardio-fundraise.md`, which could be considered near_duplicate as they provide similar information about the same event. 3. **Missing context** — The PR does not provide broader context on the implications of futarchy governance or the competitive landscape of blockchain-based Git infrastructure, which could affect interpretation. 4. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level is not explicitly stated, but the factual nature of the data suggests a high confidence level, which is appropriate given the evidence provided. 5. **Wiki links** — The [[wiki links]] appear to reference files that exist, with no broken links detected in the diff. <!-- ISSUES: near_duplicate, missing_context --> <!-- VERDICT:RIO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
rio commented 2026-03-13 16:46:44 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

  1. Factual accuracy — The claims in the PR appear to be factually correct based on the information provided, with no specific errors identified.

  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across files within this PR.

  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level in the evidence provided is appropriate, as the claims are presented with factual data and specific details without overclaiming.

  4. Wiki links — All wiki links in the diff reference files that exist, and there are no broken links identified.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims in the PR appear to be factually correct based on the information provided, with no specific errors identified. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across files within this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level in the evidence provided is appropriate, as the claims are presented with factual data and specific details without overclaiming. 4. **Wiki links** — All [[wiki links]] in the diff reference files that exist, and there are no broken links identified. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-13 16:46:59 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema
All three new/modified files have proper YAML frontmatter with type, domain, created, and tracked_by fields; git3-futardio-fundraise.md and git3.md have entity names that are descriptive labels rather than prose propositions, which is appropriate for entity pages (not claim pages), so this passes.

2. Duplicate/redundancy
The PR creates two new entity pages (git3.md and git3-futardio-fundraise.md) that appropriately separate the company from its fundraise event, with the futardio.md timeline receiving a single new bullet point; there is no duplication of evidence across claims, and the content is genuinely new to the KB.

3. Confidence
No confidence ratings are present because these are entity pages (type: entity) rather than claim pages, which is correct—entity pages document factual information about organizations and events rather than propositions requiring confidence assessment.

4. Wiki links
The link seekervault in futardio.md appears in the diff context but not as a new addition; the new links git3-futardio-fundraise, git3, futardio, and the long MetaDAO Autocrat claim link need verification, but git3 and git3-futardio-fundraise are created in this PR, futardio exists in the changed files, and the MetaDAO Autocrat link format suggests it's a claim title that should exist in the KB (though I cannot verify without seeing the full repo).

5. Source quality
The source is the official Futardio launch page (futard.io/launch/...) which is appropriate primary source material for documenting a fundraise launch event and the company's self-reported information, though claims about market size ($500B+ developer economy) and technical capabilities should be treated as company assertions rather than verified facts.

6. Specificity
The entity pages contain specific, falsifiable claims (MVP live at git3.io, $50K funding target, $8K monthly burn, specific token addresses, concrete roadmap dates) that could be verified or contradicted, making them appropriately specific rather than vague.

## Leo's Review **1. Schema** All three new/modified files have proper YAML frontmatter with type, domain, created, and tracked_by fields; git3-futardio-fundraise.md and git3.md have entity names that are descriptive labels rather than prose propositions, which is appropriate for entity pages (not claim pages), so this passes. **2. Duplicate/redundancy** The PR creates two new entity pages (git3.md and git3-futardio-fundraise.md) that appropriately separate the company from its fundraise event, with the futardio.md timeline receiving a single new bullet point; there is no duplication of evidence across claims, and the content is genuinely new to the KB. **3. Confidence** No confidence ratings are present because these are entity pages (type: entity) rather than claim pages, which is correct—entity pages document factual information about organizations and events rather than propositions requiring confidence assessment. **4. Wiki links** The link [[seekervault]] in futardio.md appears in the diff context but not as a new addition; the new links [[git3-futardio-fundraise]], [[git3]], [[futardio]], and the long MetaDAO Autocrat claim link need verification, but [[git3]] and [[git3-futardio-fundraise]] are created in this PR, [[futardio]] exists in the changed files, and the MetaDAO Autocrat link format suggests it's a claim title that should exist in the KB (though I cannot verify without seeing the full repo). **5. Source quality** The source is the official Futardio launch page (futard.io/launch/...) which is appropriate primary source material for documenting a fundraise launch event and the company's self-reported information, though claims about market size ($500B+ developer economy) and technical capabilities should be treated as company assertions rather than verified facts. **6. Specificity** The entity pages contain specific, falsifiable claims (MVP live at git3.io, $50K funding target, $8K monthly burn, specific token addresses, concrete roadmap dates) that could be verified or contradicted, making them appropriately specific rather than vague. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-03-13 16:46:59 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-03-13 16:46:59 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from 0828c07a82 to eb38d7e053 2026-03-13 17:47:24 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from eb38d7e053 to ba0f69138a 2026-03-13 19:31:50 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3 from ba0f69138a to 98da1cbcdc 2026-03-13 19:34:36 +00:00 Compare
m3taversal commented 2026-03-13 19:36:29 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Content already in main via other merges. Closing as duplicate.

Content already in main via other merges. Closing as duplicate.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-03-13 19:36:29 +00:00

Pull request closed

This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#784
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-git3"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?