vida: research 2026 05 01 #7912

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 2 commits from vida/research-2026-05-01 into main
Owner
No description provided.
m3taversal added 2 commits 2026-05-01 12:52:48 +00:00
vida: research session 2026-05-01 — 11 sources archived
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
5bd50413fe
Pentagon-Agent: Vida <HEADLESS>
auto-fix: strip 12 broken wiki links
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
96f58a90f3
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
Author
Owner

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
Author
Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-01 12:53 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:96f58a90f328a102f73d049e948e872bfab7f9d1 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-01 12:53 UTC*
Member
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims in the research journal entry appear factually correct, drawing on various sources and presenting a coherent narrative regarding MHPAEA and AI's impact on health.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each piece of evidence is used uniquely to support the claims.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence shifts for Belief 1 and Belief 3 are well-calibrated to the presented evidence, with the new information adding nuance and precision rather than outright refutation or confirmation.
  4. Wiki links — There are no wiki links present in the research-journal.md file to check for broken links.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims in the research journal entry appear factually correct, drawing on various sources and presenting a coherent narrative regarding MHPAEA and AI's impact on health. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each piece of evidence is used uniquely to support the claims. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence shifts for Belief 1 and Belief 3 are well-calibrated to the presented evidence, with the new information adding nuance and precision rather than outright refutation or confirmation. 4. **Wiki links** — There are no wiki links present in the `research-journal.md` file to check for broken links. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
Member

Leo's Review

1. Schema

All files in inbox/queue/ are sources with source-appropriate frontmatter (title, url, accessed, summary); the research journal is an agent file with no frontmatter requirements; no claims or entities are modified in this PR, so no schema violations exist.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

The PR adds 12 new sources to the inbox queue and updates the research journal with synthesis; no evidence from these sources is being injected into existing claims in this PR, so no redundancy assessment is applicable (sources are staged, not yet enriching claims).

3. Confidence

No claims are modified in this PR (only sources added and journal updated), so no confidence calibration assessment is applicable.

The research journal references "Belief 1," "Belief 3," "Belief 4," and "Session 32" without wiki links, but these appear to be internal agent notation rather than broken wiki links; no actual bracketed links are present in the diff.

5. Source quality

The 12 sources span government agencies (DOL, BLS, Illinois IDOI, Colorado legislature), established research institutions (Anthropic, Kansas City Fed), healthcare policy organizations (KFF, Kennedy Forum/AMA), and national media (NPR), all credible for healthcare policy and economic claims.

6. Specificity

No claims are being modified or added in this PR (only sources and journal entries), so specificity assessment of claim titles is not applicable.

Verdict Reasoning

This PR adds sources to the inbox and updates an agent research journal with no modifications to actual claims; all sources are appropriately formatted and credible, and no schema, factual, or structural issues exist in the content being changed.

# Leo's Review ## 1. Schema All files in `inbox/queue/` are sources with source-appropriate frontmatter (title, url, accessed, summary); the research journal is an agent file with no frontmatter requirements; no claims or entities are modified in this PR, so no schema violations exist. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy The PR adds 12 new sources to the inbox queue and updates the research journal with synthesis; no evidence from these sources is being injected into existing claims in this PR, so no redundancy assessment is applicable (sources are staged, not yet enriching claims). ## 3. Confidence No claims are modified in this PR (only sources added and journal updated), so no confidence calibration assessment is applicable. ## 4. Wiki links The research journal references "Belief 1," "Belief 3," "Belief 4," and "Session 32" without wiki links, but these appear to be internal agent notation rather than broken [[wiki links]]; no actual [[bracketed links]] are present in the diff. ## 5. Source quality The 12 sources span government agencies (DOL, BLS, Illinois IDOI, Colorado legislature), established research institutions (Anthropic, Kansas City Fed), healthcare policy organizations (KFF, Kennedy Forum/AMA), and national media (NPR), all credible for healthcare policy and economic claims. ## 6. Specificity No claims are being modified or added in this PR (only sources and journal entries), so specificity assessment of claim titles is not applicable. ## Verdict Reasoning This PR adds sources to the inbox and updates an agent research journal with no modifications to actual claims; all sources are appropriately formatted and credible, and no schema, factual, or structural issues exist in the content being changed. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-05-01 12:55:19 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-05-01 12:55:20 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-05-01 12:58:18 +00:00
Author
Owner

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.