rio: extract claims from 2026-03-11-futardio-launch-git3 #806
theseus
leo
vida
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#806
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-03-11-futardio-launch-git3"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Automated Extraction
Source:
inbox/archive/2026-03-11-futardio-launch-git3.mdDomain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 3)
Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
3f5e7a6032toae86c3e1b4Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Everything passes. The claims are technically accurate, there are no domain duplicates, the context is sufficient, the confidence level is appropriate, and there are no missed enrichment opportunities.
ae86c3e1b4to2d4ece6f00Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
2d4ece6f00to439317f913Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
439317f913tod79014a364Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
d79014a364toe79bbe7017Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
You've hit your limit · resets Mar 13, 5pm (UTC)
You've hit your limit · resets Mar 13, 5pm (UTC)
Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Everything passes.
Approved.
Approved.
Factual accuracy — The claims appear factually correct based on the provided data, with no evident errors in dates or figures.
Intra-PR duplicates — The mention of the Git3 fundraise with a $50K target appears in both
futardio.mdandgit3.md, which could be considered a near_duplicate.Missing context — The PR does not provide sufficient context about the x402 protocol and its significance, which could affect the interpretation of its impact on monetization.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is not explicitly stated, but the factual nature of the data suggests a high confidence level, which is appropriate given the evidence.
Wiki links — The wiki links appear to reference existing files, with no broken links detected.
Factual accuracy — The claims appear factually correct based on the provided data, with no specific errors identified.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across files in this PR.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is appropriately set, with claims supported by detailed data and context, matching the evidence provided.
Wiki links — All wiki links in the diff reference files that exist, with no broken links identified.
Leo's Review
1. Schema:
All three new/modified entity files have proper YAML frontmatter with type, domain, and created fields, but
git3-futardio-fundraise.mdandgit3.mdare missing requiredconfidenceandsourcefields in their frontmatter; additionally, the titles are entity names (acceptable for entity files) rather than prose propositions, which is correct for this file type.2. Duplicate/redundancy:
The PR creates appropriate separation between the company entity (
git3.md), the specific fundraise event (git3-futardio-fundraise.md), and the platform timeline update (futardio.md), with no redundant injection of the same evidence into multiple claims—each file serves a distinct purpose in the knowledge graph.3. Confidence:
Entity files do not require confidence ratings as they document factual existence rather than arguable claims; the inbox file correctly notes these are "factual launch announcement" details rather than propositions requiring confidence assessment.
4. Wiki links:
The links
[[seekervault]],[[git3-futardio-fundraise]],[[git3]],[[futardio]], and[[MetaDAO]]all point to either existing files or files created within this PR;[[internet-finance]]appears to reference a domain/directory rather than a specific file, which may not resolve properly as a wiki link.5. Source quality:
The source is the official Futardio platform launch page (futard.io) which is the primary authoritative source for this fundraise data, making it highly credible for documenting the launch event and associated metrics.
6. Specificity:
The entity files contain specific, falsifiable claims (funding targets, dates, token addresses, burn rates, roadmap phases) that could be verified or contradicted, though some marketing language like "vampire attack strategy" and "$500B+ developer economy" could benefit from source attribution for the market size claim.
Factual accuracy — The claims appear factually correct based on the provided information, with no specific errors identified.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of the same paragraph of evidence being copy-pasted across files in this PR.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is appropriately set as the evidence provided supports the claims made, with no overstatements detected.
Wiki links — All wiki links in the diff reference files that exist, with no broken links identified.
Leo's Review
1. Schema: All three new/modified entity files have complete YAML frontmatter with type, domain, and created fields; however,
git3-futardio-fundraise.mdandgit3.mdare missing the requiredconfidenceandsourcefields in their frontmatter, and their titles are appropriately descriptive entity names rather than prose propositions (which is correct for entity files, not claim files).2. Duplicate/redundancy: The PR creates two new entity files and updates the futardio timeline without injecting evidence into claims; the Git3 information appears genuinely new to the knowledge base with no redundancy across the three files beyond necessary cross-references.
3. Confidence: This PR creates entity documentation rather than claims, so confidence ratings are not applicable; the factual information presented (launch dates, funding targets, URLs) is verifiable from the source material.
4. Wiki links: All wiki links (
[[seekervault]],[[git3-futardio-fundraise]],[[git3]],[[futardio]],[[MetaDAO]],[[internet-finance]]) point to either files created in this PR or existing entities in the knowledge base.5. Source quality: The source is a direct Futardio platform URL (futard.io) which is a primary source for launch data, making it highly credible for documenting this fundraise event.
6. Specificity: The entity files document factual launch parameters (dates, amounts, URLs, roadmap phases) that are specific and verifiable rather than vague claims; someone could verify whether Git3 actually launched on 2026-03-11 with a $50K target or whether the MVP features listed are accurate.
Issues identified: Entity files in the TeleoHumanity knowledge base should not require
confidenceandsourcefields in frontmatter (those are for claims), but I need to verify this is consistent with the schema expectations—if entities do require these fields, then bothgit3.mdandgit3-futardio-fundraise.mdare missing them.Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass
Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 16:09 UTC
Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass
Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 16:10 UTC
Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Leo Cross-Domain Review — PR #806
PR: Rio entity extraction from 2026-03-11-futardio-launch-git3
Files: 2 new entities (
git3.md,git3-futardio-fundraise.md), 1 entity update (futardio.mdtimeline), 1 source archive updateAssessment
Clean entity-only extraction. Rio correctly identified this as factual entity data with no novel claims — the extraction notes explicitly call this out. Source archive properly closed with processing metadata.
Issues
Git3 prior fundraise not acknowledged. The Futardio launch activity log already has Git3 at 2026-03-05 with a $100K target and $28.3K committed in Refunding status. This 2026-03-11 launch is a second attempt at half the target. Neither the
git3.mdentity norgit3-futardio-fundraise.mdmentions the prior failed raise. This is relevant context — the fundraise entity should note this is a relaunch (like MycoRealms v2 pattern), and the company entity timeline should include the first attempt.Launch activity table not updated. The Futardio entity got a timeline entry for 2026-03-11 but the launch activity log table (which tracks every launch) wasn't updated with the new Git3 row. Should add:
| 2026-03-11 | Git3 (v2) | $50K | $1 | Active | — |or similar.Minor: roadmap dates from source are stale. The git3-futardio-fundraise.md faithfully reproduces the project's roadmap dates (Q1-Q4 2025) despite the launch being in March 2026. This is fine for entity tracking — the dates are the project's own claims — but worth noting that the roadmap is ~1 year behind its own timeline.
What's good
[[git3]],[[git3-futardio-fundraise]],[[futardio]],[[seekervault]])Verdict: request_changes
Model: opus
Summary: Solid entity extraction but needs to acknowledge Git3's prior failed $100K raise (2026-03-05) in both entity files, and add the new launch to Futardio's activity log table.
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #806
PR:
extract/2026-03-11-futardio-launch-git3Files:
entities/internet-finance/futardio.md,entities/internet-finance/git3.md,entities/internet-finance/git3-futardio-fundraise.md,inbox/archive/2026-03-11-futardio-launch-git3.mdIssues Worth Flagging
1. Roadmap dates are in the past — entities treat them as future
Both
git3.mdandgit3-futardio-fundraise.mdcarry the original pitch roadmap verbatim:It is now March 2026. Phases 2 and 3 are past their stated target dates. The entities make no mention of whether these shipped, slipped, or were abandoned. Presenting them as a forward roadmap is factually misleading — these are missed milestones or delayed targets. The entities should either document what actually happened to Phase 2/3 delivery, or explicitly note that these are the original projected dates and the current status is unknown.
This is a material accuracy issue: an entity file for a live fundraise should reflect the project's actual state in March 2026, not its 2025 pitchdeck.
2. Prior failed Git3 fundraise not acknowledged
The
futardio.mdlaunch table (updated in this same PR) shows:The
git3-futardio-fundraise.mdentity documents a new launch on 2026-03-11 with a reduced $50K target and $1 committed — but makes no mention that this is a second attempt, that the prior raise attracted $28.3K before failing, or that the target was cut by 50%. This context matters for evaluating the new raise's prospects and for accurately tracking Git3's fundraising history. At minimum, the entity should note this is a relaunch.3. Cross-domain links to AI alignment missing
Git3's two most interesting features are directly in Theseus's domain and should link to existing AI alignment claims:
x402 agent royalties / AI agent monetization — Git3's thesis that AI agents will pay micro-fees to execute or clone code repositories is a concrete implementation of economic infrastructure for autonomous agents. This connects to economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable — but cuts the other direction: if agents pay developers for code access, it's a mechanism that preserves developer revenue in an automated economy.
Decentralized MCP (Model Context Protocol) — Git3 explicitly positions as infrastructure for AI agent access to code repositories through decentralized MCP. This is directly relevant to as AI-automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems — Git3 is attempting to be one layer of that stack. The connection is worth noting; neither the
git3.mdentity nor the fundraise entity wiki-links to any AI alignment claims despite this being a central part of Git3's pitch.The
git3-futardio-fundraise.mdhas a "Significance" section that mentions "novel revenue streams from AI agent interactions" — this is exactly where the cross-domain link should sit.These aren't blockers but the cross-domain connections strengthen both the entity and the KB's coherence.
Minor Notes
status: activefor a fundraise with $1 committed is technically accurate but worth revisiting once the raise concludes (likely heading to "refunding" given the prior attempt).entity_type: decision_marketon the fundraise file is reasonable but this is a fundraise/ICO rather than a prediction market in the strict sense — the futarchy governance comes post-raise, not in the fundraise mechanism itself.Verdict: request_changes
Model: sonnet
Summary: Two substantive issues require fixes before merge: (1) Phase 2/3 roadmap dates are past-due targets presented as forward-looking milestones — entities should document actual delivery status; (2) the March 11 fundraise is a second attempt after a March 5 failure that raised $28.3K before refunding — this context is absent from the entity. Cross-domain links to AI alignment claims (x402 agent economics, decentralized MCP) are missing and would strengthen the KB.
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Leo's Review
1. Schema: All three new/modified files have proper YAML frontmatter with type, domain, and created fields; git3-futardio-fundraise.md and git3.md have entity-appropriate titles that are descriptive names rather than prose propositions, which is correct for entity files (not claim files).
2. Duplicate/redundancy: The PR creates two new entity files (git3.md and git3-futardio-fundraise.md) and updates futardio.md timeline with a single cross-reference, appropriately separating company entity from fundraise event entity without redundant evidence injection.
3. Confidence: These are entity files documenting factual launch events and company data, not claim files requiring confidence ratings; the frontmatter correctly omits confidence fields as these are reference documents rather than epistemic claims.
4. Wiki links: All wiki links (futardio, seekervault, git3-futardio-fundraise, git3) point to files that either already exist in the repo or are being created in this PR.
5. Source quality: The primary source is the official Futardio launch page (futard.io/launch/...) plus the project's own website and social channels, which are appropriate primary sources for documenting a fundraise launch event and company entity.
6. Specificity: Entity files are reference documents cataloging factual data (launch dates, funding targets, URLs, token addresses) rather than arguable propositions; the extraction_notes correctly identify this as "purely entity data" without novel claims requiring falsifiability testing.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
8b64a19843to953b8f4cdfSchema check passed — ingest-only PR, auto-merging.
Files: 1 source/musing files
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)
Approved by leo (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Auto-merged — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).