teleo/teleo-codex

Fork 0

ingestion: 1 futardio events — 20260314-1230 #836

Merged

leo merged 1 commit from ingestion/futardio-20260314-1230 into main

2026-03-14 12:32:25 +00:00

m3taversal commented

2026-03-14 12:30:32 +00:00

Owner

Batch

1 source files
Types: 1 launches

Files

2026-01-01-futardio-launch-nfaspace.md

Automated futardio ingestion daemon.

## Batch - 1 source files - Types: 1 launches ## Files - `2026-01-01-futardio-launch-nfaspace.md` Automated futardio ingestion daemon.

m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-03-14 12:30:33 +00:00

ingestion: archive futardio launch — 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-nfaspace.md f24f8ae23d

m3taversal commented

2026-03-14 12:31:01 +00:00

Author

Owner

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._

leo commented

2026-03-14 12:32:23 +00:00

Member

Schema check passed — ingest-only PR, auto-merging.

Files: 1 source/musing files

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)

**Schema check passed** — ingest-only PR, auto-merging. Files: 1 source/musing files *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)*

leo approved these changes 2026-03-14 12:32:23 +00:00

Dismissed

leo left a comment

Member

Approved by leo (automated eval)

theseus approved these changes 2026-03-14 12:32:24 +00:00

theseus left a comment

Member

Approved by theseus (automated eval)

leo merged commit 3cca1d117c into main

2026-03-14 12:32:25 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-14 12:32:25 +00:00

Member

Auto-merged — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Auto-merged** — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*

leo referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-03-14 12:32:25 +00:00

ingestion: 1 futardio events — 20260314-1230 (#836)

leo commented

2026-03-14 13:13:39 +00:00

Member

Factual accuracy — The claims in the PR appear to be factually correct based on the information provided; no specific factual errors were identified.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of duplicate evidence being copy-pasted across different files within this PR.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is appropriately set as the claims are supported by specific data points and descriptions, matching the evidence provided.
Wiki links — There are no wiki links present in the diff, so there are no broken links to flag.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims in the PR appear to be factually correct based on the information provided; no specific factual errors were identified. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no instances of duplicate evidence being copy-pasted across different files within this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level is appropriately set as the claims are supported by specific data points and descriptions, matching the evidence provided. 4. **Wiki links** — There are no [[wiki links]] present in the diff, so there are no broken links to flag.

leo commented

2026-03-14 13:13:47 +00:00

Member

Leo's Review

1. Schema: The frontmatter contains type, domain, date, and format, but is missing required fields confidence, source, and created; additionally, the title "Futardio: NFA.space fundraise goes live" is an event description rather than a prose proposition that could be true or false.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This is a new source document in the archive with status "unprocessed" and does not inject evidence into any claims, so no duplication or redundancy issues are present.

3. Confidence: No confidence level is specified in the frontmatter (this field is missing entirely), which is required for all knowledge base entries.

4. Wiki links: No wiki links appear anywhere in this diff, so there are no broken link concerns to evaluate.

5. Source quality: The source is futard.io, a futarchy-based fundraising platform, which is credible for documenting that a fundraise was launched, though the document itself is promotional material from the project rather than independent analysis.

6. Specificity: As a source document archiving a fundraise announcement, it contains specific factual claims (1,895 artists, $150,000 revenue, $125,000 funding target) that could be verified or contradicted, making it appropriately specific for its documentary purpose.

## Leo's Review **1. Schema:** The frontmatter contains type, domain, date, and format, but is missing required fields `confidence`, `source`, and `created`; additionally, the title "Futardio: NFA.space fundraise goes live" is an event description rather than a prose proposition that could be true or false. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This is a new source document in the archive with status "unprocessed" and does not inject evidence into any claims, so no duplication or redundancy issues are present. **3. Confidence:** No confidence level is specified in the frontmatter (this field is missing entirely), which is required for all knowledge base entries. **4. Wiki links:** No [[wiki links]] appear anywhere in this diff, so there are no broken link concerns to evaluate. **5. Source quality:** The source is futard.io, a futarchy-based fundraising platform, which is credible for documenting that a fundraise was launched, though the document itself is promotional material from the project rather than independent analysis. **6. Specificity:** As a source document archiving a fundraise announcement, it contains specific factual claims (1,895 artists, $150,000 revenue, $125,000 funding target) that could be verified or contradicted, making it appropriately specific for its documentary purpose.

m3taversal commented

2026-03-14 16:12:02 +00:00

Author

Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 16:12 UTC

**Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 16:12 UTC*

leo commented

2026-03-14 16:13:55 +00:00

Member

Factual accuracy — The claims in the PR appear to be factually correct based on the information provided; no specific factual errors were identified.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of duplicate evidence being copy-pasted across different sections of the PR.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level of the claims is appropriate for the evidence provided, as the document presents detailed data and projections without overclaiming certainty.
Wiki links — There are no wiki links in the diff, so there are no broken links to flag.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims in the PR appear to be factually correct based on the information provided; no specific factual errors were identified. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no instances of duplicate evidence being copy-pasted across different sections of the PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level of the claims is appropriate for the evidence provided, as the document presents detailed data and projections without overclaiming certainty. 4. **Wiki links** — There are no [[wiki links]] in the diff, so there are no broken links to flag.

leo approved these changes 2026-03-14 16:13:55 +00:00

Dismissed

leo left a comment

Member

Approved.