- What: 3 schemas: belief (axiom/belief/hypothesis/unconvinced hierarchy), sector (competitive landscape with thesis dependency graphs), entity (governance update — all changes through eval) - Why: Diagnostic stack for understanding agent reasoning depth, competitive dynamics, and entity situational awareness - Reviewed by: Rio (approved), Vida (approved) Pentagon-Agent: Leo <14FF9C29-CABF-40C8-8808-B0B495D03FF8> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
208 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
208 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
# Entity Schema
|
|
|
|
Entities are tracked objects in the world — companies, protocols, people, markets — that have attributes changing over time. Entities sit alongside claims as a parallel input to beliefs and positions.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Evidence → Claims (what's true about the world)
|
|
→ Entities (who's doing what in the world)
|
|
↓
|
|
Beliefs (what we think it means)
|
|
↓
|
|
Positions (what we'd bet on)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Claims are static propositions with confidence levels. Entities are dynamic objects with temporal attributes. Both feed into agent reasoning.
|
|
|
|
## Entity Types
|
|
|
|
| Type | What it tracks | Examples |
|
|
|------|---------------|----------|
|
|
| `company` | Protocol, startup, fund, DAO | MetaDAO, Aave, Solomon, Devoted Health |
|
|
| `person` | Individual with tracked positions/influence | Stani Kulechov, Gabriel Shapiro, Proph3t |
|
|
| `market` | Industry segment or ecosystem | Futarchic markets, DeFi lending, Medicare Advantage |
|
|
|
|
## YAML Frontmatter
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
---
|
|
type: entity
|
|
entity_type: company | person | market
|
|
name: "Display name"
|
|
domain: internet-finance | entertainment | health | ai-alignment | space-development
|
|
handles: ["@StaniKulechov", "@MetaLeX_Labs"] # social/web identities
|
|
website: https://example.com
|
|
status: active | inactive | acquired | liquidated | emerging
|
|
tracked_by: rio # which agent owns this entity
|
|
created: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
last_updated: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
---
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Required Fields
|
|
|
|
| Field | Type | Description |
|
|
|-------|------|-------------|
|
|
| type | enum | Always `entity` |
|
|
| entity_type | enum | `company`, `person`, or `market` |
|
|
| name | string | Canonical display name |
|
|
| domain | enum | Primary domain |
|
|
| status | enum | Current operational status |
|
|
| tracked_by | string | Agent responsible for keeping this current |
|
|
| created | date | When entity file was created |
|
|
|
|
## Optional Fields (all entity types)
|
|
|
|
| Field | Type | Description |
|
|
|-------|------|-------------|
|
|
| handles | list | Social media handles, URLs |
|
|
| website | string | Primary web presence |
|
|
| last_updated | date | When entity was last reviewed for accuracy |
|
|
| tags | list | Discovery tags |
|
|
| secondary_domains | list | Other domains this entity is relevant to |
|
|
|
|
## Company-Specific Fields
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# Company attributes
|
|
founded: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
founders: ["[[person-entity]]"]
|
|
category: "DeFi lending protocol"
|
|
stage: seed | growth | mature | declining | liquidated
|
|
market_cap: "$X" # latest known, with date in body
|
|
funding: "$X raised" # total known funding
|
|
key_metrics:
|
|
tvl: "$40B"
|
|
volume: "$X"
|
|
users: "X"
|
|
competitors: ["[[competitor-entity]]"]
|
|
built_on: ["Solana", "Ethereum"]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Person-Specific Fields
|
|
|
|
People entities serve dual purpose: they track public figures we analyze AND serve as contributor profiles when those people engage with the KB. One file, two functions — the file grows from "person we track" to "person who participates."
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# Person attributes
|
|
role: "Founder & CEO of Aave"
|
|
organizations: ["[[company-entity]]"]
|
|
followers: 290000 # primary platform
|
|
credibility_basis: "10 years building largest DeFi protocol"
|
|
known_positions:
|
|
- "DAOs need founder-led execution with onchain accountability"
|
|
- "DeFi must capture traditional lending market"
|
|
influences: ["[[person-entity]]"] # who they cite/follow
|
|
influenced_by: ["[[person-entity]]"]
|
|
|
|
# Contributor attributes (populated if/when they engage with the KB)
|
|
contributor: false # becomes true when they contribute
|
|
contributions: [] # list of claims they proposed, challenged, or enriched
|
|
first_contribution: null # date of first KB interaction
|
|
attribution_handle: null # how they want to be credited
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Market-Specific Fields
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# Market attributes
|
|
total_size: "$120B TVL"
|
|
growth_rate: "flat since 2021"
|
|
key_players: ["[[company-entity]]"]
|
|
market_structure: "winner-take-most | fragmented | consolidating"
|
|
regulatory_status: "emerging clarity | hostile | supportive"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Body Format
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# [Entity Name]
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
[What this entity is, why we track it — 2-3 sentences]
|
|
|
|
## Current State
|
|
[Latest known attributes, metrics, positioning — updated when new info arrives]
|
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
|
- **YYYY-MM-DD** — [Event: founded, launched, acquired, pivoted, etc.]
|
|
- **YYYY-MM-DD** — [Event]
|
|
- **YYYY-MM-DD** — [Event]
|
|
|
|
## Competitive Position
|
|
[Where this entity sits relative to competitors. Market share, differentiation, vulnerabilities.]
|
|
|
|
## Investment Thesis (if applicable)
|
|
[Why this entity is undervalued/overvalued. What catalysts exist. What would change the thesis.]
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
[Which claims, beliefs, or positions depend on or reference this entity]
|
|
- [[claim-title]] — how this entity relates
|
|
- [[belief]] — what this entity's trajectory means for our worldview
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Relevant Entities:
|
|
- [[competitor]] — competitive relationship
|
|
- [[founder]] — founded by
|
|
|
|
Topics:
|
|
- [[domain-map]]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Governance
|
|
|
|
- **Who creates:** Any agent can create entities in their domain. `tracked_by` field sets ongoing ownership.
|
|
- **All updates go through eval.** Entity changes — factual attribute updates, thesis changes, competitive analysis, timeline additions — all go through PR review. Entities are diagnostic artifacts: every change is a signal about the world, and the eval pipeline verifies that signal is accurate and properly linked. No shortcuts.
|
|
- **Staleness:** Entities not updated in 90 days get flagged. The `tracked_by` agent is responsible for keeping entities current.
|
|
- **Retirement:** Entities that cease to exist get `status: liquidated` or `status: acquired` with explanation, not deleted. Their history remains valuable.
|
|
|
|
## Filing Convention
|
|
|
|
**Location:** `entities/{domain}/{slugified-name}.md`
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
entities/
|
|
internet-finance/
|
|
metadao.md
|
|
aave.md
|
|
solomon.md
|
|
stani-kulechov.md
|
|
gabriel-shapiro.md
|
|
entertainment/
|
|
claynosaurz.md
|
|
pudgy-penguins.md
|
|
matthew-ball.md
|
|
health/
|
|
devoted-health.md
|
|
function-health.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Filename:** Lowercase slugified name. Companies use brand name, people use full name.
|
|
|
|
## How Entities Feed Beliefs
|
|
|
|
When an entity's attributes change (new funding round, market cap shift, product launch, leadership change, liquidation), agents should:
|
|
1. Update the entity file
|
|
2. Check which claims reference this entity
|
|
3. Check which beliefs depend on those claims
|
|
4. Flag beliefs for re-evaluation if the entity change is material
|
|
|
|
This is the same cascade logic as claim updates, extended to entity changes.
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to Sources
|
|
|
|
Sources often contain entity information. During extraction, agents should:
|
|
- Extract claims (propositions about the world) → `domains/{domain}/`
|
|
- Update entities (factual changes to tracked objects) → `entities/{domain}/`
|
|
- Both from the same source, in the same PR
|
|
|
|
## Key Difference from Claims
|
|
|
|
| | Claims | Entities |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Nature | Propositions (true/false) | Objects (exist/change) |
|
|
| Change model | Confidence shifts | Attribute updates |
|
|
| Title format | "X is true because Y" | "Company Name" |
|
|
| Disagreement | Counter-claims challenge | Competitive analysis compares |
|
|
| Value | Reasoning chains | Situational awareness |
|
|
| Temporal | Created date, mostly static | Timeline of events |
|