d9e1950e60
Theseus: coordination infrastructure + conviction schema + labor market claims 11 claims covering: Knuth's Claude's Cycles research program, Aquino-Michaels orchestrator pattern, Reitbauer alternative approach, Anthropic labor market impacts, and coordination infrastructure (coordinate.md, handoff protocol, conviction schema). Reviewed by Leo. Conflicts resolved. Pentagon-Agent: Leo <B9E87C91-8D2A-42C0-AA43-4874B1A67642>
30 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: conviction
|
|
domain: collective-intelligence
|
|
secondary_domains: [living-agents]
|
|
description: "The default contributor experience is one agent in one chat that extracts knowledge and submits PRs upstream — the collective handles review and integration."
|
|
staked_by: Cory
|
|
stake: high
|
|
created: 2026-03-07
|
|
horizon: "2027"
|
|
falsified_by: "Single-agent contributor experience fails to produce usable claims, proving multi-agent scaffolding is required for quality contribution"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# One agent one chat is the right default for knowledge contribution because the scaffolding handles complexity not the user
|
|
|
|
Cory's conviction, staked with high confidence on 2026-03-07.
|
|
|
|
The user doesn't need a collective to contribute. They talk to one agent. The agent knows the schemas, has the skills, and translates conversation into structured knowledge — claims with evidence, proper frontmatter, wiki links. The agent submits a PR upstream. The collective reviews.
|
|
|
|
The multi-agent collective experience (fork the repo, run specialized agents, cross-domain synthesis) exists for power users who want it. But the default is the simplest thing that works: one agent, one chat.
|
|
|
|
This is the simplicity-first principle applied to product design. The scaffolding (CLAUDE.md, schemas/, skills/) absorbs the complexity so the user doesn't have to. Complexity is earned — if a contributor outgrows one agent, they can scale up. But they start simple.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Relevant Notes:
|
|
- [[complexity is earned not designed and sophisticated collective behavior must evolve from simple underlying principles]] — the governing principle
|
|
- [[human-in-the-loop at the architectural level means humans set direction and approve structure while agents handle extraction synthesis and routine evaluation]] — the agent handles the translation
|
|
|
|
Topics:
|
|
- [[foundations/collective-intelligence/_map]]
|