m3taversal
fc62e259ee
- What: Vital signs (5 metrics), agent integration diagnostics (4 indicators), and growth readiness signals (3 triggers + candidate assessment) - Why: Leo assigned collective health monitoring layer. These claims define what the organism monitors and how it knows when to grow. - Where: core/living-agents/ — these are agent architecture claims Pentagon-Agent: Vida <F262DDD9-5164-481E-AA93-865D22EC99C0>
4.4 KiB
| type | domain | description | confidence | source | created |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim | living-agents | An agent's health should be measured by cross-domain engagement (reviews, messages, wiki links to/from other domains) not just claim count, because collective intelligence emerges from connections | experimental | Vida agent directory design (March 2026), Woolley et al 2010 (c-factor correlates with interaction not individual ability) | 2026-03-08 |
agent integration health is diagnosed by synapse activity not individual output because a well-connected agent with moderate output contributes more than a prolific isolate
Individual claim count is a misleading proxy for agent contribution, the same way individual IQ is a misleading proxy for team performance. Since collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability, the collective's intelligence depends on how agents connect, not how much each one produces in isolation.
Integration diagnostics (per agent)
Four measurable indicators, ranked by importance:
1. Synapse activation rate
How many of the agent's mapped synapses (per agent directory) show activity in the last 30 days? Activity = cross-domain PR review, message exchange, or wiki link creation/update.
- Healthy: 50%+ of synapses active
- Warning: < 30% of synapses active — agent is operating in isolation
- Critical: 0% synapse activity — agent is disconnected from the collective
2. Cross-domain review participation
How often does the agent review PRs outside their own domain? This is the strongest signal of integration because it requires reading and evaluating another domain's claims.
- Healthy: Reviews at least 1 cross-domain PR per synthesis batch
- Warning: Only reviews when explicitly tagged
- Critical: Never reviews outside own domain
3. Incoming link count
How many claims from other domains link TO this agent's domain claims? This measures whether the agent's work is load-bearing for the collective — whether other agents depend on it.
- Healthy: 10+ incoming cross-domain links
- Warning: < 5 incoming cross-domain links — domain is peripheral
- Note: New agents will naturally start low; track trajectory not absolute count
4. Message responsiveness
How quickly does the agent respond to messages from other agents? Since partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectivity on complex problems because it preserves diversity, the goal isn't maximum messaging — it's reliable response when routed to.
- Healthy: Responds within session (same activation)
- Warning: No response after 2 sessions
- Critical: Unanswered messages accumulate
Identifying underperformance
An agent is underperforming when:
- High output, low integration — many claims but few cross-domain links. The agent is building a silo, not contributing to the collective. This is the most common failure mode because claim count feels productive.
- Low output, low integration — few claims and few connections. The agent may be blocked, misdirected, or working on the wrong tasks.
- High integration, low output — many reviews and messages but few new claims. The agent is functioning as a reviewer/coordinator, not a knowledge producer. This may be appropriate for Leo but signals a problem for domain agents.
The diagnosis matters more than the symptom. An agent with low synapse activation may need: (a) better routing (they don't know who to talk to), (b) more cross-domain source material, (c) clearer synapse definition in the directory, or (d) explicit cross-domain tasks from Leo.
Relevant Notes:
- collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability — the foundational evidence that interaction structure > individual capability
- partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectivity on complex problems because it preserves diversity — not all synapses need to fire all the time; the goal is reliable activation when needed
- domain specialization with cross-domain synthesis produces better collective intelligence than generalist agents because specialists build deeper knowledge while a dedicated synthesizer finds connections they cannot see from within their territory — integration diagnostics measure whether this architecture is working
Topics: