m3taversal
b64fe64b89
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
- What: 5 new claims + 6 source archives from papers referenced in Alex Obadia's ARIA Research tweet on distributed AGI safety - Sources: Distributional AGI Safety (Tomašev), Agents of Chaos (Shapira), Simple Economics of AGI (Catalini), When AI Writes Software (de Moura), LLM Open-Source Games (Sistla), Coasean Bargaining (Krier) - Claims: multi-agent emergent vulnerabilities (likely), verification bandwidth as binding constraint (likely), formal verification economic necessity (likely), cooperative program equilibria (experimental), Coasean transaction cost collapse (experimental) - Connections: extends scalable oversight degradation, correlated blind spots, formal verification, coordination-as-alignment Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
35 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
title: "When AI Writes the World's Software, Who Verifies It?"
|
|
author: "Leonardo de Moura"
|
|
url: https://leodemoura.github.io/blog/2026/02/28/when-ai-writes-the-worlds-software-who-verifies-it
|
|
date_published: 2026-02-28
|
|
date_archived: 2026-03-16
|
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
|
secondary_domains: [teleological-economics]
|
|
status: processing
|
|
processed_by: theseus
|
|
tags: [formal-verification, lean, ai-generated-code, proof-verification, trust-infrastructure]
|
|
sourced_via: "Alex Obadia (@ObadiaAlex) tweet, ARIA Research Scaling Trust programme"
|
|
twitter_id: "712705562191011841"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# When AI Writes the World's Software, Who Verifies It?
|
|
|
|
Leonardo de Moura (AWS, Chief Architect of Lean FRO) argues AI-generated code is proliferating faster than verification can scale. Mathematical proof — not testing alone — becomes essential infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Key evidence:
|
|
- Google: >25% of new code is AI-generated; Microsoft: ~30%. Microsoft CTO predicts 95% by 2030.
|
|
- Anthropic built 100,000-line C compiler using AI agents in 2 weeks for <$20,000
|
|
- "Nearly half of AI-generated code fails basic security tests"
|
|
- Poor software quality costs US economy $2.41T/year (CSIQ 2022)
|
|
|
|
Key arguments:
|
|
- Testing provides confidence but not guarantees. "A proof cannot be gamed."
|
|
- AI overfits test suites — Claude C Compiler "hard-codes values to satisfy the test suite" and "will not generalize"
|
|
- Supply chain attacks via poisoned training data can "inject subtle vulnerabilities into every system AI touches"
|
|
- Lean has become the de facto formal verification platform (AlphaProof, 200K+ formalized theorems, 5 Fields medalists)
|
|
- Morrison (Lean FRO) demonstrated AI-generated Lean implementation of zlib with mathematical proof of correctness
|
|
- "The barrier to verified software is no longer AI capability. It is platform readiness."
|
|
|
|
Directly relevant to [[formal verification of AI-generated proofs provides scalable oversight that human review cannot match because machine-checked correctness scales with AI capability while human verification degrades]].
|