dffff37c1b
- What: Renamed claim title and all references from "defenders" to "arbitrageurs" - Why: The mechanism works through self-interested profit-seeking, not altruistic defense. Arbitrageurs correct price distortions because it is profitable, requiring no intentional defense. - Scope: 2 claim files renamed, 87 files updated across domains, core, maps, agents, entities, sources - Cascade test: foundational claim with 70+ downstream references Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <A7E04531-985A-4DA2-B8E7-6479A13513E8>
3.2 KiB
3.2 KiB
Mechanisms — The Governance Tools
The tools that make Living Capital and agent governance work. Futarchy, prediction markets, token economics, and mechanism design principles. These are the HOW — the specific mechanisms that implement the architecture.
Futarchy
- futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for arbitrageurs — why market governance is robust
- futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making — the deeper insight
- futarchy enables trustless joint ownership by forcing dissenters to be bought out through pass markets — the mechanism
- decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage — minority protection
- agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation — how proposals filter
- MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions — the liquidity constraint
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements — adoption barriers
- redistribution proposals are futarchys hardest unsolved problem because they can increase measured welfare while reducing productive value creation — the redistribution problem
- coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy — why price works as objective
Prediction Markets
- speculative markets aggregate information through incentive and selection effects not wisdom of crowds — why markets work
- Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election — the vindication moment
- called-off bets enable conditional estimates without requiring counterfactual verification — mechanism design tool
Token Economics & Governance
- token voting DAOs offer no minority protection beyond majority goodwill — why voting alone fails
- quadratic voting fails for crypto because Sybil resistance and collusion prevention are unsolvable — why not QV
- blind meritocratic voting forces independent thinking by hiding interim results while showing engagement — a design principle
- governance mechanism diversity compounds organizational learning because disagreement between mechanisms reveals information no single mechanism can produce — why multiple mechanisms
- optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles — mechanism selection
Platform
- MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window — the on-chain mechanism
- MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale — the platform
- permissionless leverage on metaDAO ecosystem tokens catalyzes trading volume and price discovery that strengthens governance by making futarchy markets more liquid — the leverage thesis