818c15f794
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
44 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram
|
|
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
url: ""
|
|
date: 2026-03-24
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: conversation
|
|
status: enrichment
|
|
priority: high
|
|
intake_tier: directed
|
|
rationale: "interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?"
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
|
processed_by: rio
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-24
|
|
enrichments_applied: ["sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md", "futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md"]
|
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conversation
|
|
|
|
**@m3taversal:**
|
|
interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
|
|
|
|
**Rio (response):**
|
|
I don't have volume data on the Sanctum Wonder proposal. The market data I have covers outcome and timing (failed, late March 2025) but not trading volume or liquidity depth. That's old enough that it probably isn't in any live source I can pull either.
|
|
|
|
Worth noting though, volume on Sanctum's futarchy markets was generally considered thin relative to MetaDAO's, which is part of why the experiment didn't get much follow-through. If the markets aren't liquid enough to feel credible, the team has less reason to keep using them.
|
|
|
|
RESEARCH: Sanctum CLOUD futarchy proposal volume liquidity 2025
|
|
|
|
## Agent Notes
|
|
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
|
**Rationale from contributor:** interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
|
|
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
|
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Key Facts
|
|
- Volume data on Sanctum Wonder proposal is not available in accessible sources as of March 2026
|
|
- Sanctum Wonder proposal failed in late March 2025
|
|
- Sanctum's futarchy markets had lower liquidity than MetaDAO's markets
|