Teleo Agents 6459163781 epimetheus: source archive restructure — 537 files reorganized

inbox/queue/ (52 unprocessed) — landing zone for new sources
inbox/archive/{domain}/ (311 processed) — organized by domain
inbox/null-result/ (174) — reviewed, nothing extractable

One-time atomic migration. All paths preserved (wiki links use stems).

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>

2026-03-18 11:52:23 +00:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

type

title

author

url

date

domain

format

status

tags

linked_set

curator_notes

extraction_hints

priority

processed_by

processed_date

enrichments_applied

extraction_model

source

@PineAnalytics X archive — 100 most recent tweets

Pine Analytics (@PineAnalytics)

https://x.com/PineAnalytics

2026-03-09

internet-finance

enrichment

metadao

analytics

futardio

decision-markets

governance-data

jupiter

metadao-x-landscape-2026-03

On-chain analytics research hub — the data arm of the MetaDAO ecosystem. Pine produced the Q4 2025 quarterly report and Futardio launch metrics. Their work is pure data with minimal editorial — exactly the kind of source that produces high-confidence enrichments to existing claims. Key contribution: decision market participation data, ICO performance metrics, and comparative governance analysis (Jupiter voting vs MetaDAO futarchy). Already have an existing archive for the Q4 report (2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report.md) and Futardio launch (2026-03-05-pineanalytics-futardio-launch-metrics.md).

Decision market data across multiple proposals — volume, trader count, alignment percentages

bankme -55% in 45min vs MetaDAO protections — data point for 'futarchy-governed liquidation' claim

Jupiter governance comparison: 303 views, 2 comments vs futarchy $40K volume / 122 trades — enriches 'token voting DAOs offer no minority protection' claim

Futardio launch metrics already partially archived — check for new data not in existing archive

Cross-reference with existing archives to avoid duplication

medium

rio

2026-03-16

metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

@PineAnalytics X Archive (March 2026)

Substantive Tweets

Decision Market Data

Tracks volume and participation across MetaDAO governance proposals
Provides the quantitative backbone for claims about futarchy effectiveness
Key data: contested decisions show dramatically higher engagement than routine ones
bankme token dropped 55% in 45 minutes — contrast with MetaDAO ecosystem where no ICO has gone below launch price

Jupiter Governance Comparison

Jupiter governance proposal: 303 views, 2 comments
MetaDAO futarchy equivalent: $40K volume, 122 trades
The engagement differential is stark — markets produce real participation where forums produce silence
This is the strongest empirical argument for futarchy over token voting

MetaDAO Q4 2025 Report

Comprehensive quarterly metrics (already archived separately)
8 ICOs, $25.6M raised, $390M committed
$300M AMM volume, $1.5M in fees
95% refund rate from oversubscription — capital efficiency metric

Futardio Launch Metrics

Already partially archived separately
Additional data: participation demographics, wallet analysis, time-to-fill curves
First permissionless raise performance compared to curated MetaDAO ICOs

Noise Filtered Out

Mostly retweets and community engagement
Original content is almost exclusively data-driven — very little opinion

Key Facts

Jupiter governance proposal: 303 views, 2 comments
MetaDAO futarchy equivalent: $40K volume, 122 trades
bankme token dropped 55% in 45 minutes
No MetaDAO ICO has gone below launch price as of Q4 2025
MetaDAO Q4 2025: 8 ICOs, $25.6M raised, $390M committed
MetaDAO Q4 2025: $300M AMM volume, $1.5M in fees
MetaDAO Q4 2025: 95% refund rate from oversubscription

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History