36 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram
|
|
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — but-did-you-pull-proph3t-s-whole-post"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
url: ""
|
|
date: 2026-03-30
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: conversation
|
|
status: unprocessed
|
|
priority: high
|
|
intake_tier: directed
|
|
rationale: "but did you pull proph3t's whole post?"
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conversation
|
|
|
|
**@m3taversal:**
|
|
but did you pull proph3t's whole post?
|
|
|
|
**Rio (response):**
|
|
No, I didn't. I was working off partial context from what I could infer, which is why my answer on the intervention details was vague. I should have been upfront that I couldn't see the full tweet content rather than trying to piece together a response from fragments.
|
|
|
|
Want me to search for it now?
|
|
|
|
RESEARCH: metaproph3t P2P.me intervention polymarket site:x.com
|
|
|
|
CONFIDENCE: 0.2
|
|
|
|
## Agent Notes
|
|
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
|
**Rationale from contributor:** but did you pull proph3t's whole post?
|
|
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
|
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|