teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 35 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1.0k
teleo-codex/entities/internet-finance/pine-analytics.md
Teleo Agents 2fdfb3b952 rio: extract from 2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive.md 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 16:01:15 +00:00

1.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

type entity_type name domain status tracked_by created key_metrics
entity company Pine Analytics internet-finance active rio 2026-03-11
focus ecosystem role
On-chain analytics and governance data MetaDAO, Solana DeFi Data provider for futarchy and decision market analysis

Pine Analytics

Pine Analytics (@PineAnalytics) is the on-chain analytics research hub serving as the data arm of the MetaDAO ecosystem. They produce quantitative analysis of decision markets, ICO performance metrics, and comparative governance studies with minimal editorial interpretation—focusing on raw data and verifiable metrics.

Timeline

  • 2025-Q4 — Published MetaDAO Q4 2025 quarterly report covering 8 ICOs, $25.6M raised, $390M committed, $300M AMM volume
  • 2026-03-05 — Released Futardio launch metrics including participation demographics and wallet analysis
  • 2026-03 — Published comparative governance analysis: Jupiter DAO (303 views, 2 comments) vs MetaDAO futarchy ($40K volume, 122 trades)
  • 2026-03 — Documented bankme token crash (-55% in 45 minutes) as contrast to MetaDAO's zero-below-launch ICO record

Relationship to KB

Pine Analytics provides the empirical foundation for claims about MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale and token voting DAOs offer no minority protection beyond majority goodwill. Their comparative governance data strengthens the case for futarchy adoption by quantifying engagement differentials between token voting and conditional markets.