1.5 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | date | domain | format | status | proposed_by | contribution_type | tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram-contribution | Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's | @m3taversal | 2026-03-30 | internet-finance | contribution | unprocessed | @m3taversal | source-submission |
|
Source: Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's response. From @met
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat. Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
Verbatim User Message
we should always be up front about that. Here is is: https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268
Rio's Context
Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's response. From @metaproph3t on X (2025-07-13): "To address the obvious... Two weeks ago, the founder of P2P placed a bet on Polymarket that P2P would reach $6M of commits in its ICO. Over the last 48 hours, many people have tweeted about this. Here are some of these tweets: I wanted to take the time to talk about how we're thinking about this and what we're doing. 1: Had we known about this, we would have pushed that they not participate in these markets. Ever since they started, these prediction markets have been a source of consternation for us. We've asked Poly..." URL: https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268