teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 60 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1.0k
teleo-codex/entities/space-development/ian-stoner.md
Teleo Agents f797e1a4cc
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
astra: extract claims from 2026-04-29-gottlieb-2019-space-colonization-existential-risk-pro-mars 
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-04-29-gottlieb-2019-space-colonization-existential-risk-pro-mars.md
- Domain: space-development
- Claims: 0, Entities: 2
- Enrichments: 2
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Astra <PIPELINE>
2026-04-29 06:23:30 +00:00

976 B
Raw Blame History

Ian Stoner

Domain: space-development
Type: person
Role: Philosophy professor

Overview

Ian Stoner is a philosopher who argued against Mars colonization on environmental ethics grounds in his 2017 paper, applying the Principle of Scientific Conservation (PSC) to argue that Mars should remain pristine as a scientifically valuable object.

Key Positions

Anti-Mars colonization argument (2017):

  • Applied Principle of Scientific Conservation to Mars
  • Argued there are no countervailing considerations that override the PSC obligation
  • Compared Mars to the Great Pyramids: studying them for 100+ years doesn't justify converting them to hotels
  • Position was later challenged by Gottlieb (2019) on existential risk grounds

Timeline

  • 2017 — Published argument against Mars colonization based on Principle of Scientific Conservation
  • 2019 — Gottlieb published rebuttal arguing existential risk mitigation overrides PSC concerns