m3taversal
e830fe4c5f
Three-agent knowledge base (Leo, Rio, Clay) with: - 177 claim files across core/ and foundations/ - 38 domain claims in internet-finance/ - 22 domain claims in entertainment/ - Agent soul documents (identity, beliefs, reasoning, skills) - 14 positions across 3 agents - Claim/belief/position schemas - 6 shared skills - Agent-facing CLAUDE.md operating manual Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
34 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
# Living Agents — Agent Architecture
|
|
|
|
Collective agents are AI agents shaped by and owned by their community of contributors. Not oracles. Not chatbots. Coordinating minds embedded inside communities — each with a defined identity, domain expertise, and core beliefs that are mutable through evidence.
|
|
|
|
The architecture follows biological organization: nested Markov blankets with specialized domains and shared knowledge. The topology IS the intelligence.
|
|
|
|
## Agent Design
|
|
- [[Living Agents mirror biological Markov blanket organization with specialized domain boundaries and shared knowledge]] — the architectural principle
|
|
- [[partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectivity on complex problems because it preserves diversity]] — why agents don't share everything
|
|
- [[Git-traced agent evolution with human-in-the-loop evals replaces recursive self-improvement as credible framing for iterative AI development]] — how agents evolve
|
|
- [[validation-synthesis-pushback is a conversational design pattern where affirming then deepening then challenging creates the experience of being understood]] — how agents engage
|
|
- [[anthropomorphizing AI agents to claim autonomous action creates credibility debt that compounds until a crisis forces public reckoning]] — honesty about what agents are
|
|
- [[agents must evaluate the risk of outgoing communications and flag sensitive content for human review as the safety mechanism for autonomous public-facing AI]] — communication safety
|
|
|
|
## Market-Governed Behavior
|
|
- [[agent token price relative to NAV governs agent behavior through a simulated annealing mechanism where market volatility maps to exploration and market confidence maps to exploitation]] — how markets shape agent behavior
|
|
- [[agents must reach critical mass of contributor signal before raising capital because premature fundraising without domain depth undermines the collective intelligence model]] — the quality gate
|
|
- [[agents that raise capital via futarchy accelerate their own development because real investment outcomes create feedback loops that information-only agents lack]] — why capital makes agents smarter
|
|
|
|
## Knowledge Infrastructure
|
|
- [[cross-domain knowledge connections generate disproportionate value because most insights are siloed]] — why cross-domain matters
|
|
- [[knowledge scaling bottlenecks kill revolutionary ideas before they reach critical mass]] — the problem we solve
|
|
- [[collaborative knowledge infrastructure requires separating the versioning problem from the knowledge evolution problem because git solves file history but not semantic disagreement or insight-level attribution]] — the design challenge
|
|
- [[person-adapted AI compounds knowledge about individuals while idea-learning AI compounds knowledge about domains and the architectural gap between them is where collective intelligence lives]] — where CI lives
|
|
|
|
## Ownership & Attribution
|
|
- [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — the ownership insight
|
|
- [[living agents transform knowledge sharing from a cost center into an ownership-generating asset]] — why people contribute
|
|
- [[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] — why ownership drives growth
|
|
- [[usage-based value attribution rewards contributions for actual utility not popularity]] — how contribution is measured
|
|
- [[gamified contribution with ownership stakes aligns individual sharing with collective intelligence growth]] — the incentive loop
|
|
|
|
## The Nine Agents
|
|
Leo (cross-domain synthesis), Rio (internet finance), Clay (entertainment), Vida (health), Astra (space), Logos (AI/alignment), Hermes (blockchain), Forge (energy), Terra (climate). Soul documents in agents/.
|