1.8 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-not-the-proposal-we-were-talking-about-i-m | @m3taversal | 2026-03-23 | internet-finance | conversation | unprocessed | high | directed | that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal | @m3taversal |
|
Conversation
@m3taversal: that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal
Rio (response): You're right, my bad. I conflated the two. I don't actually have structured data on the George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal in my KB. What I gave you was the Ranger liquidation claim, which is a completely different proposal.
I know the GMU proposal exists and the broad strokes (funding academic futarchy research with Hanson), but I can't give you the decision market text or detailed claim data because I genuinely don't have it stored. If you have the proposal details or a link, I'd take that as a contribution worth adding.
LEARNING: factual I do not have a KB entry for the MetaDAO George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal. Do not fabricate or substitute other proposal data when asked about it.
RESEARCH: MetaDAO George Mason University Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.