26 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram-contribution
|
|
title: "Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
date: 2026-03-30
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: contribution
|
|
status: unprocessed
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
contribution_type: source-submission
|
|
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'governance']
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Source: Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's response. From @met
|
|
|
|
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
|
|
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
|
|
|
|
## Verbatim User Message
|
|
|
|
we should always be up front about that. Here is is: https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268
|
|
|
|
## Rio's Context
|
|
|
|
Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's response. From @metaproph3t on X (2025-07-13): "To address the obvious... Two weeks ago, the founder of P2P placed a bet on Polymarket that P2P would reach $6M of commits in its ICO. Over the last 48 hours, many people have tweeted about this. Here are some of these tweets: I wanted to take the time to talk about how we're thinking about this and what we're doing. 1: Had we known about this, we would have pushed that they not participate in these markets. Ever since they started, these prediction markets have been a source of consternation for us. We've asked Poly..." URL: https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268
|