teleo-codex/decisions/internet-finance/git3-futardio-fundraise.md
Teleo Agents 0da42ebbf1 schema: move 68 decision_market entities to decisions/internet-finance/
Separates governance decisions from entities. decision_market type replaced
by type: decision in new decisions/ directory. Entities (companies, people,
protocols) remain in entities/{domain}/.

Architecture: Leo (schema), Rio (taxonomy), Ganymede (migration), Rhea (ops)
Implemented by: Epimetheus

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>
2026-03-16 17:31:07 +00:00

2.4 KiB

type entity_type name domain status parent_entity platform proposal_url proposal_date resolution_date category summary key_metrics tracked_by created
decision decision_market Git3: Futardio Fundraise internet-finance failed git3 futardio https://www.futard.io/launch/HKRDmghovXSCMobiRCZ7BBdHopEizyKmnhJKywjk3vUa 2026-03-05 2026-03-06 fundraise Git3 attempted to raise $100K through futarchy-governed launch for on-chain Git infrastructure
funding_target total_committed outcome token token_mint
$100,000 $28,266 refunding 6VT 6VTMeDtrtimh2988dhfYi2rMEDVdYzuHoSgERUmdmeta
rio 2026-03-11

Git3: Futardio Fundraise

Summary

Git3 launched a futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio targeting $100,000 to build on-chain Git infrastructure with permanent storage on Irys blockchain. The project proposed bringing Git repositories on-chain as NFTs with x402 monetization, GitHub Actions integration, and AI agent interoperability. The raise achieved 28.3% of target ($28,266 committed) before entering refunding status after one day.

Market Data

  • Outcome: Failed (Refunding)
  • Funding Target: $100,000
  • Total Committed: $28,266 (28.3% of target)
  • Launch Date: 2026-03-05
  • Closed: 2026-03-06
  • Token: 6VT
  • Platform: Futardio v0.7

Significance

This represents a failed futarchy-governed fundraise for developer infrastructure, demonstrating that not all technically sound projects achieve funding targets through prediction markets. The 28.3% fill rate suggests either insufficient market validation of the code-as-asset thesis, limited awareness of the launch, or skepticism about the team's ability to execute the ambitious roadmap (12-month runway, three development phases, enterprise features).

The refunding outcome is notable because Git3 had a live MVP, clear technical architecture, and alignment with broader trends (on-chain code storage, AI agent infrastructure, x402 protocol). The failure suggests futarchy markets can filter projects even when fundamentals appear strong, potentially due to go-to-market concerns, competitive positioning (GitHub's dominance), or team credibility questions.

Relationship to KB

  • git3 — parent entity
  • futardio — fundraising platform
  • MetaDAO — futarchy infrastructure provider
  • Demonstrates futarchy-governed fundraise failure despite live MVP and technical merit