Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-04-25-natlawreview-ninth-circuit-kalshi-scotus-trajectory.md - Domain: internet-finance - Claims: 1, Entities: 1 - Enrichments: 2 - Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <PIPELINE>
15 lines
No EOL
842 B
Markdown
15 lines
No EOL
842 B
Markdown
# Ryan Nelson
|
|
|
|
**Role:** Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
|
|
|
|
**Appointed:** Trump administration
|
|
|
|
**Relevance:** Presiding judge in Nevada v. Kalshi 9th Circuit case (April 2026)
|
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
|
|
|
- **2026-04-16** — Presided over 9th Circuit oral arguments in Nevada v. Kalshi. Appeared to accept Nevada's Rule 40.11 argument, stating 'The language says it can't go up (on the platform). I don't know how you can read it differently.' This represents an unusual alignment for a Trump-appointed Republican judge to favor state regulatory authority over federal preemption in a financial services context.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
Nelson's apparent acceptance of the Rule 40.11 paradox argument during oral arguments signals potential 9th Circuit ruling against Kalshi, which would create circuit split with 3rd Circuit's pro-preemption ruling. |