inbox/queue/ (52 unprocessed) — landing zone for new sources
inbox/archive/{domain}/ (311 processed) — organized by domain
inbox/null-result/ (174) — reviewed, nothing extractable
One-time atomic migration. All paths preserved (wiki links use stems).
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>
2.2 KiB
2.2 KiB
| type | source_id | title | url | author | date_published | date_accessed | processed_date | processed_by | claims_extracted | enrichments_applied | tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | 2025-03-28-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-build-a-sanctum-mobile-app-wonder | Futardio Proposal: Should Sanctum Build a Sanctum Mobile App (Wonder)? | https://futarchy.substack.com/p/proposal-should-sanctum-build-a-sanctum | Futarchy.io / Sanctum team | 2025-03-28 | 2025-03-28 | 2025-03-28 | knowledge-base-maintainer |
|
|
|
Futardio Proposal: Should Sanctum Build a Sanctum Mobile App (Wonder)?
Summary
Proposal submitted to MetaDAO's futarchy governance mechanism asking whether Sanctum should build "Wonder" - a consumer mobile application combining social features with yield generation. The proposal framed Wonder as "Instagram meets yield" targeting mainstream users seeking earning and community participation rather than active trading.
Key Details
- Proposer: Sanctum team
- Governance mechanism: MetaDAO futarchy (CLOUD token markets)
- Proposal date: March 28, 2025
- Outcome: Failed
- Strategic context: Pivot from infrastructure to consumer products
- Company context: Sanctum raised at $3B valuation (January 2025)
Core Thesis
Sanctum's product vision: "We believe the next wave of crypto adoption will come from apps that make earning and belonging delightful, not from better trading interfaces."
Product Concept
Wonder mobile app:
- Social features + passive yield generation
- Target: mainstream users, not crypto-native traders
- Success metrics: DAU and retention vs. trading volume
- Positioning: consumer fintech meets social network
Archival Notes
- Source processed: 2025-03-28
- Claims extracted: 2 (consumer crypto thesis, futarchy governance case study)
- Enrichments: Added context to existing futarchy mechanism claims
- Timeline note: All dates are 2025 (source created and processed same year)