541d9ce6bf
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-09-solanafloor-x-archive.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
32 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
32 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: claim
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
description: "Jupiter DAO achieved 75% support for Net Zero Emissions proposal, providing comparative governance data for futarchy analysis"
|
|
confidence: proven
|
|
source: "SolanaFloor X archive (2026-03-09) — Jupiter DAO vote coverage"
|
|
created: 2026-03-10
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Jupiter DAO Net Zero vote achieved 75% support
|
|
|
|
Jupiter DAO's governance vote on the Net Zero Emissions proposal achieved 75% support, demonstrating token-based DAO governance in action. This provides comparative data for analyzing futarchy versus traditional token voting governance mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
## Evidence
|
|
- [[source:SolanaFloor X archive 2026-03-09]] — Jupiter DAO vote: 75% support for Net Zero Emissions proposal
|
|
|
|
## Challenges
|
|
- Limited context on voter participation rates or quorum requirements
|
|
- No comparison to futarchy decision quality
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Relevant Notes:
|
|
- [[internet-finance/MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — futarchy vs token voting comparison
|
|
- [[internet-finance/optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms]] — governance mechanism diversity
|
|
- [[internet-finance/token voting DAOs offer no minority protection beyond majority goodwill]] — token voting limitations
|
|
|
|
Topics:
|
|
- [[dao-governance]]
|
|
- [[jupiter-dao]]
|
|
- [[token-voting]]
|
|
- [[comparative-governance]]
|