- Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-git3.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 6) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2 KiB
2 KiB
| type | entity_type | name | domain | status | parent_entity | platform | proposal_url | proposal_date | resolution_date | category | summary | key_metrics | tracked_by | created | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entity | decision_market | Git3: Futardio Fundraise | internet-finance | failed | git3 | futardio | https://www.futard.io/launch/HKRDmghovXSCMobiRCZ7BBdHopEizyKmnhJKywjk3vUa | 2026-03-05 | 2026-03-06 | fundraise | Git3 attempted to raise $100K for on-chain Git infrastructure development through Futardio but reached only 28% of target before refunding |
|
rio | 2026-03-11 |
Git3: Futardio Fundraise
Summary
Git3 launched a futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio targeting $100,000 to accelerate development of on-chain Git infrastructure with x402 monetization. The raise attracted $28,266 (28.3% of target) before entering refunding status, representing a failed capital formation attempt for blockchain-based code storage infrastructure.
Market Data
- Outcome: Failed (Refunding)
- Platform: Futardio
- Target: $100,000
- Committed: $28,266 (28.3%)
- Duration: 2026-03-05 to 2026-03-06 (1 day)
- Token: 6VT
Significance
This represents a test case for futarchy-governed fundraising for developer infrastructure. The low commitment ratio (28.3%) suggests either:
- Market skepticism about on-chain Git storage value proposition
- Insufficient liquidity/awareness in early Futardio ecosystem
- Competitive positioning challenges versus established Git hosting
- Timing issues with developer infrastructure fundraising
The rapid refunding (within 1 day) demonstrates the unruggable ICO mechanism working as designed — investors can force liquidation when projects fail to meet funding thresholds.