1.2 KiB
1.2 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | extraction_model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — but-did-you-pull-proph3t-s-whole-post | @m3taversal | 2026-03-30 | internet-finance | conversation | null-result | high | directed | but did you pull proph3t's whole post? | @m3taversal |
|
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 |
Conversation
@m3taversal: but did you pull proph3t's whole post?
Rio (response): No, I didn't. I was working off partial context from what I could infer, which is why my answer on the intervention details was vague. I should have been upfront that I couldn't see the full tweet content rather than trying to piece together a response from fragments.
Want me to search for it now?
RESEARCH: metaproph3t P2P.me intervention polymarket site:x.com
CONFIDENCE: 0.2
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: but did you pull proph3t's whole post? Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.