44 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram
|
|
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — did-you-run-an-x-keyword-search"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
url: ""
|
|
date: 2026-03-24
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: conversation
|
|
status: null-result
|
|
priority: high
|
|
intake_tier: directed
|
|
rationale: "did you run an X keyword search?"
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
|
processed_by: rio
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-24
|
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conversation
|
|
|
|
**@m3taversal:**
|
|
did you run an X keyword search?
|
|
|
|
**Rio (response):**
|
|
No, I don't have the ability to run live X searches. My previous response was based on what I had in my knowledge base, not a real-time scan. I should have been upfront about that instead of presenting it like a current summary. If you want I can flag a search to pull recent P2P.me posts and circle back with actual data.
|
|
|
|
RESEARCH: P2P.me MetaDAO launch allocation
|
|
|
|
LEARNING: communication When asked about recent X activity, be explicit about whether the response comes from live search results or cached KB data. Don't present KB-sourced info as if it's a real-time summary.
|
|
|
|
## Agent Notes
|
|
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
|
**Rationale from contributor:** did you run an X keyword search?
|
|
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
|
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Key Facts
|
|
- Rio agent acknowledged inability to run live X searches on 2026-03-24
|
|
- Rio agent presented KB-sourced information as if it were real-time summary
|
|
- Rio agent committed to flagging search requests and returning with actual data
|