teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 18 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
teleo-codex/entities/internet-finance/coal-establish-development-fund.md
Teleo Agents 5f91037d7f rio: extract from 2024-12-05-futardio-proposal-establish-development-fund.md 
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-12-05-futardio-proposal-establish-development-fund.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 15:57:30 +00:00

2 KiB
Raw Blame History

type entity_type name domain status parent_entity platform proposer proposal_url proposal_date resolution_date category summary tracked_by created
entity decision_market COAL: Establish Development Fund? internet-finance failed coal futardio AH7F2EPHXWhfF5yc7xnv1zPbwz3YqD6CtAqbCyE9dy7r https://www.futard.io/proposal/DhY2YrMde6BxiqCrqUieoKt5TYzRwf2KYE3J2RQyQc7U 2024-12-05 2024-12-08 treasury Proposal to establish a 4.2% emissions allocation development fund for COAL protocol development, community rewards, and marketing initiatives rio 2026-03-11

COAL: Establish Development Fund?

Summary

Proposal to allocate 4.2% of COAL mining emissions (472.5 COAL/day) to a development fund managed by a DAO multisig. The fund would support protocol development, reward community contributions, and enable marketing initiatives. The allocation would increase total supply growth by 4.2% rather than reducing mining rewards.

Market Data

  • Outcome: Failed
  • Proposer: AH7F2EPHXWhfF5yc7xnv1zPbwz3YqD6CtAqbCyE9dy7r
  • Created: 2024-12-05
  • Completed: 2024-12-08
  • Proposal Account: DhY2YrMde6BxiqCrqUieoKt5TYzRwf2KYE3J2RQyQc7U

Significance

This proposal represents a governance test of whether a fair-launch community (no pre-mine, no team allocation) will vote to establish ongoing protocol funding through emissions. The failure indicates resistance to dilution even when mining rewards are preserved, revealing community preference for zero-inflation tokenomics over funded development.

The 4.2% allocation structure (472.5 COAL/day from 11,250 base rate) shows an attempt to balance sustainability with fairness by increasing total emissions rather than redirecting miner rewards. The rejection suggests the community prioritized supply scarcity over development funding.

Relationship to KB