f70720aa78
- 131 sources → processed (matched to decisions/entities by proposal hash) - 72 sources → null-result (test/spam) - 109 sources → null-result (futardio unmatched, no KB output) - 91 sources kept unprocessed (genuine backlog: health, ai-alignment, space-dev, etc.) - 117 decisions get source_archive backlinks - 131 archive sources get derived_items forward links - Linking pattern: frontmatter only, file paths as identifiers (Ganymede Option A) Script: reconcile-sources.py (proposal hash matching + entity name matching) Co-Authored-By: Epimetheus <noreply@pentagon.ai>
2.9 KiB
| type | entity_type | name | domain | status | parent_entity | platform | proposer | proposal_url | proposal_date | resolution_date | autocrat_version | category | summary | tracked_by | created | source_archive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | decision_market | Sanctum: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials? | internet-finance | passed | sanctum | futardio | Sanctum team | https://v1.metadao.fi/sanctum/trade/7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv | 2025-02-03 | 2025-02-06 | 0.3 | community | Fun governance experiment — temporarily change Sanctum logo for one week to familiarize community with futarchy voting UI | rio | 2026-03-24 | inbox/archive/2025-02-03-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-change-its-logo-on-its-website-and-socials.md |
Sanctum: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?
Summary
Sanctum's inaugural futarchy proposal (CLOUD-0) — explicitly framed as a "fun proposal" to onboard the community to futarchy governance mechanics. If passed, Sanctum would temporarily change its logo on website and socials to a community-edited version for one week. The proposal passed on 2025-02-06, serving as a low-stakes test of the governance UI before higher-stakes proposals.
Market Data
- Outcome: Passed
- Proposal Account: 7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv
- Proposal Number: CLOUD-0 (Sanctum's zeroth governance proposal)
- Duration: 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-06 (3 days deliberation + 3 days voting)
Significance
This proposal is the futarchy equivalent of a "hello world" — a deliberately low-stakes decision designed to teach the community how the governance UI works before real treasury decisions are tabled. The explicit framing ("This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI") demonstrates Sanctum's staged adoption strategy: start with trivial decisions to build muscle memory, then escalate to consequential ones. This mirrors the pattern seen in futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.
Relationship to KB
- sanctum — first governance decision (CLOUD-0)
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements — deliberate low-stakes onboarding to reduce adoption friction
- futardio — governance platform
Full Proposal Text
Source: Sanctum governance forum, tabled 2025-02-03
This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI and how Sanctum Governance will work. All proposals have a deliberation process before officially tabled up to governance. This proposal has the following timeline:
- 3 days deliberation
- 3 days voting
CLOUD-0: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?
This proposal would approve the temporary change of the Sanctum logo on its website and socials to the following logo for one week after the successful conclusion of the vote.