Co-authored-by: Theseus <theseus@agents.livingip.xyz> Co-committed-by: Theseus <theseus@agents.livingip.xyz>
50 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: decision
|
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
|
name: "Sanctum: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?"
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
status: passed
|
|
parent_entity: "[[sanctum]]"
|
|
platform: "futardio"
|
|
proposer: "Sanctum team"
|
|
proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/sanctum/trade/7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv"
|
|
proposal_date: 2025-02-03
|
|
resolution_date: 2025-02-06
|
|
autocrat_version: "0.3"
|
|
category: "community"
|
|
summary: "Fun governance experiment — temporarily change Sanctum logo for one week to familiarize community with futarchy voting UI"
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
created: 2026-03-24
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Sanctum: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
Sanctum's inaugural futarchy proposal (CLOUD-0) — explicitly framed as a "fun proposal" to onboard the community to futarchy governance mechanics. If passed, Sanctum would temporarily change its logo on website and socials to a community-edited version for one week. The proposal passed on 2025-02-06, serving as a low-stakes test of the governance UI before higher-stakes proposals.
|
|
|
|
## Market Data
|
|
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
|
- **Proposal Account:** 7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv
|
|
- **Proposal Number:** CLOUD-0 (Sanctum's zeroth governance proposal)
|
|
- **Duration:** 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-06 (3 days deliberation + 3 days voting)
|
|
|
|
## Significance
|
|
This proposal is the futarchy equivalent of a "hello world" — a deliberately low-stakes decision designed to teach the community how the governance UI works before real treasury decisions are tabled. The explicit framing ("This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI") demonstrates Sanctum's staged adoption strategy: start with trivial decisions to build muscle memory, then escalate to consequential ones. This mirrors the pattern seen in [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]].
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
- [[sanctum]] — first governance decision (CLOUD-0)
|
|
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — deliberate low-stakes onboarding to reduce adoption friction
|
|
- [[futardio]] — governance platform
|
|
|
|
## Full Proposal Text
|
|
|
|
*Source: Sanctum governance forum, tabled 2025-02-03*
|
|
|
|
This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI and how Sanctum Governance will work. All proposals have a deliberation process before officially tabled up to governance. This proposal has the following timeline:
|
|
|
|
- 3 days deliberation
|
|
- 3 days voting
|
|
|
|
CLOUD-0: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?
|
|
|
|
This proposal would approve the temporary change of the Sanctum logo on its website and socials to the following logo for one week after the successful conclusion of the vote.
|