64f707b3cb
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 5) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
51 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
51 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: entity
|
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
|
name: "IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model"
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
status: passed
|
|
parent_entity: "[[deans-list]]"
|
|
platform: "futardio"
|
|
proposer: "IslandDAO"
|
|
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/5c2XSWQ9rVPge2Umoz1yenZcAwRaQS5bC4i4w87B1WUp"
|
|
proposal_date: 2024-07-18
|
|
resolution_date: 2024-07-22
|
|
category: "treasury"
|
|
summary: "Proposal to charge clients in USDC, use 80% to buy $DEAN tokens for citizen payment, retain 20% DAO tax in USDC as hedge"
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
The Dean's List DAO proposed switching from USDC-based contributor payments to a model where client revenue (charged in USDC) is used to purchase $DEAN tokens on the open market, which are then distributed to DAO citizens as payment. The DAO retains 20% of revenue as tax in USDC to hedge against token price volatility. The proposal argued this creates structural buy pressure (80% of revenue) that exceeds sell pressure (estimated 80% of distributed tokens sold by citizens), resulting in net positive price action.
|
|
|
|
## Market Data
|
|
|
|
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
|
- **Proposer:** IslandDAO
|
|
- **Proposal Account:** 5c2XSWQ9rVPge2Umoz1yenZcAwRaQS5bC4i4w87B1WUp
|
|
- **Completed:** 2024-07-22
|
|
- **Platform:** Futardio (MetaDAO's futarchy implementation)
|
|
|
|
## Significance
|
|
|
|
This proposal represents an early experiment in DAO treasury management where:
|
|
|
|
1. **Token buyback as compensation mechanism**: Rather than paying contributors in stablecoins, the DAO uses revenue to create buy pressure on its governance token, distributing tokens as payment.
|
|
|
|
2. **Stablecoin treasury hedge**: The DAO retains its tax in USDC rather than its own token, acknowledging token price risk while still using the token for contributor alignment.
|
|
|
|
3. **Quantified price impact modeling**: The proposal included detailed FDV projections (5.33% increase expected) and price impact estimates, demonstrating the analytical overhead futarchy governance requires.
|
|
|
|
4. **Structural buy pressure thesis**: The model assumes DAO tax retention (20%) creates permanent net buy pressure because buys (80% of revenue) exceed sells (80% of 80% = 64% of revenue).
|
|
|
|
The proposal's passage suggests MetaDAO's futarchy markets validated the economic logic, though actual performance data post-implementation is not available in this source.
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
|
|
- [[deans-list]] - parent entity, treasury governance decision
|
|
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] - governance mechanism used
|
|
- [[token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance]] - related economic model
|