teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 66 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
teleo-codex/entities/internet-finance/futardio-launch-git3.md
Teleo Agents 65ef0d3f88 rio: extract from 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-git3.md 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-git3.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 08:46:34 +00:00

2.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

type entity_type name domain status parent_entity platform proposal_url proposal_date resolution_date category summary key_metrics tracked_by created
entity decision_market Futardio: Git3 Fundraise internet-finance failed git3 futardio https://www.futard.io/launch/HKRDmghovXSCMobiRCZ7BBdHopEizyKmnhJKywjk3vUa 2026-03-05 2026-03-06 fundraise Git3 attempted to raise $100K for on-chain Git infrastructure but achieved only 28% commitment
raise_target total_committed commitment_ratio token token_mint
$100,000 $28,266 0.28 6VT 6VTMeDtrtimh2988dhfYi2rMEDVdYzuHoSgERUmdmeta
rio 2026-03-11

Futardio: Git3 Fundraise

Summary

Git3 launched a futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio targeting $100K to build on-chain Git repository infrastructure with x402 monetization. Despite detailed technical roadmap, team planning, and live MVP, the raise achieved only $28,266 in commitments (28% of target) before entering refund status.

Market Data

  • Outcome: Failed (refunded)
  • Launch date: 2026-03-05
  • Resolution date: 2026-03-06
  • Target: $100,000
  • Committed: $28,266 (28%)
  • Token: 6VT

Significance

This launch demonstrates market selectivity on Futardio beyond pure meme coin speculation. Git3 presented professional infrastructure thesis with:

  • Live MVP at git3.io
  • Detailed 3-phase roadmap through Q4 2025
  • Clear burn rate ($8K/month) and 12-month runway target
  • Technical integration with GitHub Actions and Irys blockchain
  • Monetization model through x402 protocol and repository NFTs

Despite this preparation, the market rejected the valuation or thesis at 28% commitment. Suggests that infrastructure plays may require different launch dynamics than speculative tokens, or that the "Code as Asset" thesis lacked market conviction.

The rapid failure (1 day from launch to refund) indicates either:

  1. Insufficient pre-launch community building
  2. Market skepticism about code monetization demand
  3. Valuation mismatch between team expectations and market assessment
  4. Competition from existing centralized Git hosting

Relationship to KB