181a86c99e
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-08-defirate-fourth-circuit-kalshi-panel-skeptical.md - Domain: internet-finance - Claims: 0, Entities: 1 - Enrichments: 3 - Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <PIPELINE>
9 lines
No EOL
500 B
Markdown
9 lines
No EOL
500 B
Markdown
# Max Brauer
|
|
|
|
**Role:** Attorney representing Maryland in Fourth Circuit preemption case against Kalshi
|
|
|
|
**Key Argument:** Sports event contracts don't fit the statutory 'swaps' definition and remain subject to state regulation under traditional police powers.
|
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
|
|
|
- **2026-05-07/08** — Argued Maryland's position before Fourth Circuit three-judge panel in KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (No. 25-1892). Panel appeared receptive to argument that sports contracts fall outside CEA preemption scope. |