Adds complete proposal text to all 28 MetaDAO governance records that previously had only hand-built summaries. This was the original batch from PR #1748 that was closed without merge due to rebase conflict. Records updated: - Proposals 1-15: LST vote market, Autocrat migrations (v01/v02), Saber vote market, spot market creation, AMM program, multi-option proposals, OTC trades (Ben Hawkins, Pantera, Colosseum), Dutch auction, burn 99.3% META, FaaS development, benevolent dictators, compensation - Proposals 16-36: Fundraise 2, Q3 roadmap, create Futardio, services agreement, hire Advaith, swap ISC, hire Robin Hanson, token split, release launchpad, OTC Theia, migrate META token, fund futarchy research Source: inbox/archive/internet-finance/ proposal archives from futard.io Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
4.7 KiB
| type | entity_type | name | domain | status | tracked_by | created | last_updated | parent_entity | platform | proposer | proposal_url | proposal_date | resolution_date | category | summary | tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | decision_market | MetaDAO: Approve Fundraise #2 | internet-finance | passed | rio | 2026-03-11 | 2026-03-11 | metadao | futardio | Proph3t | https://v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/9BMRY1HBe61MJoKEd9AAW5iNQyws2vGK6vuL49oR3AzX | 2024-06-26 | 2024-06-30 | fundraise | Raise $1.5M by selling up to 4,000 META to VCs and angels at minimum $375/META ($7.81M FDV), no discount, no lockup |
|
MetaDAO: Approve Fundraise #2
Summary
Proposal to raise $1.5M by selling up to 4,000 META to VCs and angels. Terms: no discount, no lockup, minimum price $375/META (implying $7.81M minimum FDV based on 20,823.5 META in public hands). Funds custodied by Proph3t and Nallok in a multisig, released at $100K/month to minimize DAO attack risk. Burn rate: $1.38M/year covering two founders ($90K each), three engineers ($190K each), audits ($300K), office ($80K), growth person ($150K), and admin ($100K).
Market Data
- Outcome: Passed (2024-06-30)
- Autocrat version: 0.3
- Key participants: Proph3t (proposer), Nallok (multisig co-custodian)
Significance
This was MetaDAO's first VC fundraise approved through futarchy — the market decided whether to dilute existing holders for growth capital. The "no discount, no lockup" terms are unusual for crypto fundraises and reflect futarchy's transparency ethos: investors get the same terms as the market.
The multisig custodianship ($100K/month release) reveals a practical tension: futarchy governs the fundraise decision, but operational security requires trusted custodians. The DAO cannot safely hold and disburse large sums through governance alone — an early signal of the pattern where futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate scaffolding for treasury operations.
The detailed budget breakdown provides one of the few public windows into early MetaDAO operational costs, valuable for benchmarking futarchy-governed organizations.
Relationship to KB
- metadao — capital formation event
- internet-capital-markets-compress-fundraising-timelines — futarchy-governed fundraise completed in 4 days
- futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance — multisig custody alongside futarchy approval
- futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control — but this raise has identifiable custodians, complicating the "no beneficial owners" argument
Relevant Entities:
Topics:
Full Proposal Text
Source: futard.io, tabled 2024-06-26
Overview
Three weeks ago, MetaDAO launched the futarchy protocol with Drift, Dean's List, and Future. Our goal is to onboard more Solana DAOs. To do that, Nallok and I have a few ideas for growth initiatives, including:
-
Social: seeing who's trading in the markets
-
NFTs: allowing NFT communities to leverage decision markets
-
Special contracts: creating custom financial contracts that make it easier to make grants decisions through decision markets
To accelerate this, our goal is to hire a small team. Between us ($90k/yr each), three engineers ($190k/yr each), audits ($300k), office space ($80k/yr), a growth person ($150k/yr), and other administrative expenses ($100k/yr), we're looking at a $1.38M burn rate.
To fund this, I'm proposing that the DAO raise $1.5M by selling META to a combination of venture capitalists and angels. Specifically, we would sell up to 4,000 META with no discount and no lockup.
Nallok and I would execute this sale on behalf of the DAO. To minimize the risk of a DAO attack, the money raised would be custodied by us in a multisig and released to the DAO treasury at a rate of $100k / month.
The exact terms of the sale would be left to our discretion. This includes details such as who is given allocation, whether to raise more than $1.5M, how escrow is managed, et cetera. However, we would be bound to a minimum price: $375. Given that there'd be 20,823.5 META in the hands of the public (which includes VCs + angels) after this raise, this means we would be unable to sell tokens at less than a $7.81M valuation. Everyone who participates in the raise will get similar terms. We will make public who's participated after it's complete.