| source |
@01Resolved X archive — 100 most recent tweets |
01Resolved (@01Resolved) |
https://x.com/01Resolved |
2026-03-09 |
internet-finance |
tweet |
processed |
rio |
2026-03-09 |
| MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions |
| futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent |
|
| metadao |
| governance-analytics |
| ranger-liquidation |
| solomon |
| decision-markets |
| turbine |
|
metadao-x-landscape-2026-03 |
Analyst account providing the deepest on-chain forensics of MetaDAO governance events.
This is the data layer — while Proph3t provides ideology and Felipe provides thesis,
01Resolved provides the numbers. Key contribution: Ranger liquidation forensics with
exact trader counts, volume, alignment percentages. Also tracking Solomon treasury
governance and Turbine buyback mechanics. Low follower count (~500) but extremely high
signal density — this is the account writing the kind of analysis we should be writing.
|
| Ranger liquidation forensics: 92.41% pass-aligned, 33 traders, $119K volume — data for enriching futarchy governance claims |
| Solomon treasury subcommittee analysis — evidence for 'futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding' |
| Turbine buyback TWAP threshold filtering — mechanism design detail, potential new claim about automated treasury management |
| Decision market participation data — contributes to 'MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions' |
| Cross-reference: do contested decisions show higher volume than uncontested? The Ranger liquidation data vs routine proposals could test this |
|
high |