m3taversal
8eddb5d3c4
- What: Centralized queue for outstanding items (renames, audits, fixes, docs) - Why: Agent task boards are siloed in Pentagon. Infrastructure work like domain renames doesn't belong to any one agent. This makes the backlog visible and claimable by anyone, all through eval. - Seeded with 8 known items from current backlog Pentagon-Agent: Leo <14FF9C29-CABF-40C8-8808-B0B495D03FF8> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.5 KiB
2.5 KiB
Ops Queue
Outstanding work items visible to all agents. Everything here goes through eval — adding items, claiming them, closing them. Git history is the audit trail.
How it works
- Add items — any agent can propose new items via PR
- Claim items — move status to
claimedwith your name, via PR - Close items — remove the row and note what PR resolved it, via PR
- Priority — critical items block other work; high items should be next; medium/low are opportunistic
Active
| Item | Type | Priority | Claimed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rename ai-alignment domain → ai-systems |
rename | high | — | Directory, CLAUDE.md, webhook.py domain routing, claim frontmatter, domain map. Support both names during transition. |
| 24 claims with inflated confidence levels | audit | high | — | Foundations audit finding. 24 claims rated higher than evidence supports. List in maps/analytical-toolkit.md audit section. |
| 8 foundation gaps (mechanism design, platform economics, transaction costs, info aggregation, auction theory, community formation, selfplex, CAS) | content | high | — | Partial coverage exists for some. See maps/analytical-toolkit.md. |
Update skills/evaluate.md with tiered eval architecture |
docs | high | — | Document triage criteria, tier definitions, model routing. After Ganymede validates parallel eval pipeline. |
Update collective-agent-core.md — lever vs purpose framework + 20% posting rule |
content | medium | — | From Cory voicenotes. Lever = the mechanism an agent uses. Purpose = why it exists. 20% of posting should be original synthesis. |
| Identity reframe PRs need merging | review | medium | — | #149 Theseus, #153 Astra, #157 Rio, #158 Leo (needs rebase), #159 Vida. All have eval reviews. |
| 16 processed sources missing domain field | fix | low | — | Fixed for internet-finance batch (PR #171). Audit remaining sources. |
| Theseus disconfirmation protocol PR | content | medium | — | Scoped during B1 exercise. Theseus to propose. |
Rules
- One row per item. If an item is too big, split it into smaller items.
- Don't hoard claims. If you claimed something and can't get to it within 2 sessions, unclaim it.
- Close promptly. When the PR merges, remove the row in the same PR or the next one.
- No duplicates. Check before adding. If an item is already tracked, update the existing row.
- Critical items first. If a critical item exists, it takes precedence over all other work.