Teleo Agents 0da42ebbf1 schema: move 68 decision_market entities to decisions/internet-finance/

Separates governance decisions from entities. decision_market type replaced
by type: decision in new decisions/ directory. Entities (companies, people,
protocols) remain in entities/{domain}/.

Architecture: Leo (schema), Rio (taxonomy), Ganymede (migration), Rhea (ops)
Implemented by: Epimetheus

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>

2026-03-16 17:31:07 +00:00

2.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

type	entity_type	name	domain	status	parent_entity	platform	proposer	proposal_url	proposal_date	resolution_date	category	summary	tracked_by	created
decision	decision_market	MetaDAO: Swap $150,000 into ISC?	internet-finance	failed	metadao	futardio	@Richard_ISC	https://www.futard.io/proposal/Gp3ANMRTdGLPNeMGFUrzVFaodouwJSEXHbg5rFUi9roJ	2024-10-30	2024-11-03	treasury	Proposal to convert $150,000 USDC (6.8% of treasury) into ISC stablecoin to hedge against dollar devaluation	rio	2026-03-11

MetaDAO: Swap $150,000 into ISC?

Summary

MetaDAO proposed converting $150,000 USDC (approximately 6.8% of its $2.2M treasury) into ISC, a Solana-native inflation-resistant stablecoin. The proposal argued that holding USD exposes the DAO to devaluation risk (17.8% loss since 2020) and that ISC's basket-collateralized design (20% each: cash, commodities, treasuries, bonds, equities) provides better value preservation. The proposal failed.

Market Data

Outcome: Failed
Proposer: @Richard_ISC (ISC team member)
Treasury Context: MetaDAO held ~$2.2M USDC at proposal time
Proposed Allocation: 6.8% of treasury
Execution Plan: DCA order on Jupiter (10 orders over 10 hours, $15K each, price range $1.70-$1.90)

Significance

This proposal represents an early test case for DAO treasury diversification into alternative stablecoins through futarchy governance. The failure suggests either:

Market skepticism about ISC's value proposition relative to USDC
Risk aversion to allocating treasury to a smaller, newer stablecoin
Concerns about the proposer's conflict of interest (ISC team member)

The proposal included a reciprocal governance commitment: ISC would use MetaDAO futarchy for its own governance decisions (removing freeze authority, basket composition changes), positioning this as a potential partnership rather than pure treasury management.

Relationship to KB

metadao - treasury management decision
MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions - relevant to understanding market participation patterns

2.1 KiB Raw Blame History