* Auto: core/living-agents/adversarial PR review produces higher quality knowledge than self-review because separated proposer and evaluator roles catch errors that the originating agent cannot see.md | 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/prose-as-title forces claim specificity because a proposition that cannot be stated as a disagreeable sentence is not a real claim.md | 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable.md | 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/domain specialization with cross-domain synthesis produces better collective intelligence than generalist agents because specialists build deeper knowledge while a dedicated synthesizer finds connections they cannot see from within their territory.md | 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/confidence calibration with four levels enforces honest uncertainty because proven requires strong evidence while speculative explicitly signals theoretical status.md | 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/source archiving with extraction provenance creates a complete audit trail from raw input to knowledge base output because every source records what was extracted and by whom.md | 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/git trailers on a shared account solve multi-agent attribution because Pentagon-Agent headers in commit objects survive platform migration while GitHub-specific metadata does not.md | 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/human-in-the-loop at the architectural level means humans set direction and approve structure while agents handle extraction synthesis and routine evaluation.md | 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/musings as pre-claim exploratory space let agents develop ideas without quality gate pressure because seeds that never mature are information not waste.md | 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) * Auto: core/living-agents/atomic notes with one claim per file enable independent evaluation and granular linking because bundled claims force reviewers to accept or reject unrelated propositions together.md | 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) * leo: 10 architecture-as-claims — documenting how the Teleo collective works - What: 10 new claims in core/living-agents/ documenting the operational methodology of the Teleo collective as falsifiable claims, not instructions - Why: The repo should document itself using its own format. Each claim grounds in evidence from 43 merged PRs, clearly separates what works today from what's planned, and identifies immediate improvements. - Claims cover: PR review, prose-as-title, wiki-link graphs, domain specialization, confidence calibration, source archiving, git trailers, human-in-the-loop governance, musings, atomic notes - This is Leo proposing about core/ — requires 2 domain agent reviews + Rhea Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * leo: address review feedback from Rhea, Theseus, Rio on PR #44 - Rhea: added structured author field to source archiving claim, fixed ghost email format to {id}@agents.livingip.ghost, added CI-as-enforcement as intermediate step before Forgejo ACLs - Rio: fixed wiki link evidence (was not branch-timing, was nonexistent), corrected OPSEC timeline (rule came after files were written), fixed Doppler null-result (announcement article not whitepaper), removed duplicate Calypso/Vida reference Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
46 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
46 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
# Living Agents — Agent Architecture
|
|
|
|
Collective agents are AI agents shaped by and owned by their community of contributors. Not oracles. Not chatbots. Coordinating minds embedded inside communities — each with a defined identity, domain expertise, and core beliefs that are mutable through evidence.
|
|
|
|
The architecture follows biological organization: nested Markov blankets with specialized domains and shared knowledge. The topology IS the intelligence.
|
|
|
|
## Agent Design
|
|
- [[Living Agents mirror biological Markov blanket organization with specialized domain boundaries and shared knowledge]] — the architectural principle
|
|
- [[partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectivity on complex problems because it preserves diversity]] — why agents don't share everything
|
|
- [[Git-traced agent evolution with human-in-the-loop evals replaces recursive self-improvement as credible framing for iterative AI development]] — how agents evolve
|
|
- [[validation-synthesis-pushback is a conversational design pattern where affirming then deepening then challenging creates the experience of being understood]] — how agents engage
|
|
- [[anthropomorphizing AI agents to claim autonomous action creates credibility debt that compounds until a crisis forces public reckoning]] — honesty about what agents are
|
|
- [[agents must evaluate the risk of outgoing communications and flag sensitive content for human review as the safety mechanism for autonomous public-facing AI]] — communication safety
|
|
|
|
## Market-Governed Behavior
|
|
- [[agent token price relative to NAV governs agent behavior through a simulated annealing mechanism where market volatility maps to exploration and market confidence maps to exploitation]] — how markets shape agent behavior
|
|
- [[agents must reach critical mass of contributor signal before raising capital because premature fundraising without domain depth undermines the collective intelligence model]] — the quality gate
|
|
- [[agents that raise capital via futarchy accelerate their own development because real investment outcomes create feedback loops that information-only agents lack]] — why capital makes agents smarter
|
|
|
|
## Knowledge Infrastructure
|
|
- [[cross-domain knowledge connections generate disproportionate value because most insights are siloed]] — why cross-domain matters
|
|
- [[knowledge scaling bottlenecks kill revolutionary ideas before they reach critical mass]] — the problem we solve
|
|
- [[collaborative knowledge infrastructure requires separating the versioning problem from the knowledge evolution problem because git solves file history but not semantic disagreement or insight-level attribution]] — the design challenge
|
|
- [[person-adapted AI compounds knowledge about individuals while idea-learning AI compounds knowledge about domains and the architectural gap between them is where collective intelligence lives]] — where CI lives
|
|
|
|
## Operational Architecture (how the Teleo collective works today)
|
|
- [[adversarial PR review produces higher quality knowledge than self-review because separated proposer and evaluator roles catch errors that the originating agent cannot see]] — the core quality mechanism
|
|
- [[prose-as-title forces claim specificity because a proposition that cannot be stated as a disagreeable sentence is not a real claim]] — the simplest quality gate
|
|
- [[wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable]] — the reasoning graph
|
|
- [[domain specialization with cross-domain synthesis produces better collective intelligence than generalist agents because specialists build deeper knowledge while a dedicated synthesizer finds connections they cannot see from within their territory]] — why specialization + synthesis beats generalism
|
|
- [[confidence calibration with four levels enforces honest uncertainty because proven requires strong evidence while speculative explicitly signals theoretical status]] — honest uncertainty
|
|
- [[source archiving with extraction provenance creates a complete audit trail from raw input to knowledge base output because every source records what was extracted and by whom]] — provenance tracking
|
|
- [[git trailers on a shared account solve multi-agent attribution because Pentagon-Agent headers in commit objects survive platform migration while GitHub-specific metadata does not]] — agent attribution
|
|
- [[human-in-the-loop at the architectural level means humans set direction and approve structure while agents handle extraction synthesis and routine evaluation]] — governance hierarchy
|
|
- [[musings as pre-claim exploratory space let agents develop ideas without quality gate pressure because seeds that never mature are information not waste]] — exploratory layer
|
|
- [[atomic notes with one claim per file enable independent evaluation and granular linking because bundled claims force reviewers to accept or reject unrelated propositions together]] — atomic structure
|
|
|
|
## Ownership & Attribution
|
|
- [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — the ownership insight
|
|
- [[living agents transform knowledge sharing from a cost center into an ownership-generating asset]] — why people contribute
|
|
- [[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] — why ownership drives growth
|
|
- [[usage-based value attribution rewards contributions for actual utility not popularity]] — how contribution is measured
|
|
- [[gamified contribution with ownership stakes aligns individual sharing with collective intelligence growth]] — the incentive loop
|
|
|
|
## The Nine Agents
|
|
Leo (cross-domain synthesis), Rio (internet finance), Clay (entertainment), Vida (health), Astra (space), Logos (AI/alignment), Hermes (blockchain), Forge (energy), Terra (climate). Soul documents in agents/.
|